1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
|
Return-Path: <dev@jonasschnelli.ch>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44F54904
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 07:27:59 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from server3 (server3.include7.ch [144.76.194.38])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600178C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 07:27:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by server3 (Postfix, from userid 115)
id E5BBD2E603F2; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 08:27:56 +0100 (CET)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received: from Jonass-MacBook-Pro.local (cable-static-140-182.teleport.ch
[87.102.140.182]) by server3 (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 458DC2D002C4
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 13 Nov 2015 08:27:56 +0100 (CET)
To: Bitcoin development mailing list <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
From: Jonas Schnelli <dev@jonasschnelli.ch>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <564590F4.8040605@jonasschnelli.ch>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 08:27:48 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Ads on bitcoin.org website
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 07:27:59 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi all
I'm a little bit concerned about the future of bitcoin.org.
A neutral website that informs about bitcoin, bitcoin-applications and
bitcoin-exchanges is important at this "early stage".
You might have seen that bitcoin.com does not claim to be neutral and
informative. As counterweight, a neutral and ad-free bitcoin.org site
is even more important.
Recently, bitcoin.org did merge a PR [1] that enables Google analytics
for bitcoin.org. The PR comments did show disagreement for this step.
For me, this seems to be against the about-us rules [2] in about "who
is in charge of bitcoin".
Personally I think allowing Google to collect data of bitcoin.org
visitors is against the bitcoin "philosophy".
Another PR [3] (not merged yet) would enable the technical base to
display ads on the site.
What ads would be displayed there?
If an ad provider would be implemented (like Google Ads), very likely
bitcoin related things like bitcoin application vendors or bitcoin
exchanges would be shown there.
Wouldn't this attack the neutrality model of bitcoin.org?
I think, it would move bitcoin.org in the wrong direction, towards
sites like bitcoin.com and it would loose the neutral "feeling" and
users and press very likely will see this as a "greedy" step.
I'd like to know, how changes on bitcoin.org happen? Do they follow
consensus-agreement among bitcoin-space contributors or does a group
of people decide what to merge and what not?
If site operators or contributers need to get payed for their (highly
appreciated) work or need to pay for infrastructure, we should address
this root problem.
I'm pretty sure we can raise funds for a such purpose and I'm offering
my help to speak to bitcoin businesses and individuals.
[1] https://github.com/bitcoin-dot-org/bitcoin.org/pull/1087
[2] https://bitcoin.org/en/about-us
[3] https://github.com/bitcoin-dot-org/bitcoin.org/pull/1136
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=ZXsV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
