1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <gmaxwell@gmail.com>) id 1Z5fYP-00044O-GT
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 18 Jun 2015 19:32:49 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.213.174 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.213.174; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com;
helo=mail-ig0-f174.google.com;
Received: from mail-ig0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1Z5fYO-0007xd-Ot
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 18 Jun 2015 19:32:49 +0000
Received: by igbqq3 with SMTP id qq3so23548751igb.0
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Thu, 18 Jun 2015 12:32:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.163.146 with SMTP id m140mr17381643ioe.85.1434655963557;
Thu, 18 Jun 2015 12:32:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.147.213 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 12:32:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9BD8D5D8-3A4B-4361-BF4C-25E1019CA428@bluematt.me>
References: <55828737.6000007@riseup.net>
<CANEZrP3M7+BsZKLFZV-0A_fC7NmMGbTDxsx3ywru3dSW78ZskQ@mail.gmail.com>
<20150618111407.GA6690@amethyst.visucore.com>
<CAPg+sBj_go==m6-++sA53imYdz4OLH4bkyiuAyEM8YR8CaTd=w@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJHLa0OKXaUD6MnN4N6RGbNwrXx43jBm9MiELQK6BRw1OL3HNA@mail.gmail.com>
<0ede5c200ce70e4d92541dd91749b4ea@riseup.net>
<CAJHLa0NiDamkrbW2TMoTLqMPhzw0LBboNp1+_atBGDYMa135uw@mail.gmail.com>
<e6da277c39b0354cdf24361e20a1fce2@riseup.net>
<CAPWm=eX5Oc4QXkp3H5thPBPzJ-t7JGzF5pVaP+eSd0=h52ku=A@mail.gmail.com>
<CABsx9T1ENeoZ968PDGUgBPdZLmkwRCDtBvZ2BwT0HaFdWxSL3g@mail.gmail.com>
<9BD8D5D8-3A4B-4361-BF4C-25E1019CA428@bluematt.me>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 19:32:43 +0000
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgSaoHic3Qm0KVrrbD0cU6G=qAJXQAKHv+m2zwnrgSfhpg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: Matt Corallo <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(gmaxwell[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
0.0 AWL AWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address
X-Headers-End: 1Z5fYO-0007xd-Ot
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Concerns Regarding Threats by a Developer
to Remove Commit Access from Other Developers
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 19:32:49 -0000
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Matt Corallo <bitcoin-list@bluematt.me> wr=
ote:
> Ive been trying to stay out of these increasingly useless shit-throwing c=
ontests, but I wanted to take objection to this... I highly, highly doubt a=
ny seriously technical person is making any kind of decision on block size =
issues based on their own personal network. If you're assuming this is a se=
rious motivating factor for anyone, then I'm not sure you've even been read=
ing your email or listening to the conversations you've had with people ove=
r the last year or more.
It's probably due to me: When I point to trends and broadband
_distribution_ in the US (much less the less developed parts of the
world), I'm being "hypothetical", and when I point to my _own_
connectivity as a concrete example it's "personal". It's no joke that
communication is _hard_ but it's a shared responsibility however, and
no need to assume anyone isn't reading.,
|
