1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <flavien.charlon@pixodegames.com>) id 1WgtJR-0002Zy-Ul
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sun, 04 May 2014 10:06:25 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of
pixodegames.com designates 209.85.215.54 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.215.54;
envelope-from=flavien.charlon@pixodegames.com;
helo=mail-la0-f54.google.com;
Received: from mail-la0-f54.google.com ([209.85.215.54])
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1WgtJQ-0002kV-8U
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sun, 04 May 2014 10:06:25 +0000
Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id gf5so2085335lab.13
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Sun, 04 May 2014 03:06:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
bh=Wmoqa0WEyGN8x4fxGHos7qil6qAN4nt4/Sm2KcifMaA=;
b=Bk1yRb6XDNS56a7D8xRktng22+Pjv9Uz0N+hO1q8rxFAV3kH50H8qLg44XAQj4ivRt
9nGsk824geLNOkZwwe9h+lXarHL7h8p0GNCdiT/Jiy6C9EfzteeqSezo+kSAvEBPgodv
puU2B7pPLgaZkeI8Qcvj9cAvVsehXKW2sq+S2hJMcouzdkmt0WsI6eHFy4/i8vPwHpVW
WqDBoLb/lcszo7QFhRu5BR1PuaXrq4UMs3GWFNrvpLEiNIiGBtUrWyyozEQqVqenh+U5
gmCBlEplsNJEXJLbvkr3v+0jk9t6rwJGkA6uDtGB0lIotDhVp2yJkgLZ6kFMPnSmQ2sg
DUZg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkluLGIBAwOVykZmOXXU3doCJpyl/qSe89wWIb+/sQcm/t6Uzw93CRCvE68NKNSxpbYuXAy
X-Received: by 10.112.254.163 with SMTP id aj3mr20605120lbd.20.1399197977407;
Sun, 04 May 2014 03:06:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-f43.google.com (mail-la0-f43.google.com
[209.85.215.43]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
mw10sm5481779lbb.24.2014.05.04.03.06.16
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Sun, 04 May 2014 03:06:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f43.google.com with SMTP id c6so4014971lan.16
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Sun, 04 May 2014 03:06:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.152.246.43 with SMTP id xt11mr7014586lac.34.1399197976864;
Sun, 04 May 2014 03:06:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.114.185.230 with HTTP; Sun, 4 May 2014 03:05:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [79.97.126.227]
In-Reply-To: <CAJHLa0NPJgZqgxhGYrFXdHwAgYNnE_At7tDzLb2V=K5TnXO7FQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABbpET-uDQRFQ_XAFeWkgc=A1jEW62Q+8BTZZuW5UbZXX0y+HQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJHLa0NPJgZqgxhGYrFXdHwAgYNnE_At7tDzLb2V=K5TnXO7FQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Flavien Charlon <flavien.charlon@coinprism.com>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2014 11:05:36 +0100
Message-ID: <CABbpET9W28zKKWjXTDm6k6ka48+giy7JQBAbDBtJNsS3WqRv-g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133a77461bd3804f8902a58
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1WgtJQ-0002kV-8U
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bug with handing of OP_RETURN?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 10:06:26 -0000
--001a1133a77461bd3804f8902a58
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Thanks, that makes sense, just wanted to make sure this what the problem
was.
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 6:15 AM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@bitpay.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Flavien Charlon
> <flavien.charlon@coinprism.com> wrote:
> > Outputs are above dust, inputs are not spent. OP_RETURN is supposed to be
> > standard in 0.9.1 and the data is well below 40 bytes, so why is this
> being
> > rejected?
>
> The carried data must all be contained within one pushdata.
>
> --
> Jeff Garzik
> Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
> BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/
>
--001a1133a77461bd3804f8902a58
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">Thanks, that makes sense, just wanted to make sure this wh=
at the problem was.</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><br><div class=3D"g=
mail_quote">On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 6:15 AM, Jeff Garzik <span dir=3D"ltr">&=
lt;<a href=3D"mailto:jgarzik@bitpay.com" target=3D"_blank">jgarzik@bitpay.c=
om</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Flavien=
Charlon<br>
<<a href=3D"mailto:flavien.charlon@coinprism.com">flavien.charlon@coinpr=
ism.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Outputs are above dust, inputs are not spent. OP_RETURN is supposed to=
be<br>
> standard in 0.9.1 and the data is well below 40 bytes, so why is this =
being<br>
> rejected?<br>
<br>
</div>The carried data must all be contained within one pushdata.<br>
<span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888"><br>
--<br>
Jeff Garzik<br>
Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist<br>
BitPay, Inc. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<a href=3D"https://bitpay.com/" target=3D"=
_blank">https://bitpay.com/</a><br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>
--001a1133a77461bd3804f8902a58--
|
