1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
|
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <mh.in.england@gmail.com>) id 1WwbBf-0006G4-FQ
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 16 Jun 2014 17:59:19 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.214.170 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.214.170; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com;
helo=mail-ob0-f170.google.com;
Received: from mail-ob0-f170.google.com ([209.85.214.170])
by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1WwbBd-0002V1-PL
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 16 Jun 2014 17:59:19 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f170.google.com with SMTP id uz6so6104369obc.15
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Mon, 16 Jun 2014 10:59:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.134.175 with SMTP id pl15mr3782553oeb.81.1402941552166;
Mon, 16 Jun 2014 10:59:12 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com
Received: by 10.76.71.162 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 10:59:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1801389.9PVWAZniMG@crushinator>
References: <87aaf81b20e17332175a3fbcd091c317.squirrel@fulvetta.riseup.net>
<53959513.H7tOyQYvqT@crushinator> <539F244C.2090009@gmail.com>
<1801389.9PVWAZniMG@crushinator>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 19:59:12 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: HTEU8U9GlGPsrSES3d3Meti2yR0
Message-ID: <CANEZrP0eNDuGnm1vESwoe=9HWUKZGQ5CKsDZ8SHsQxCaNEjRsA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: Matt Whitlock <bip@mattwhitlock.name>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b41ce12db900e04fbf7c8d9
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(mh.in.england[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1WwbBd-0002V1-PL
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Incentivizing the running of full nodes
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 17:59:19 -0000
--047d7b41ce12db900e04fbf7c8d9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> This is a cool idea, but doesn't it generate some perverse incentives? If
> I'm running a full node and I want to pay CheapAir for some plane tickets,
> I'll want to pay in the greatest number of individual transactions possible
Peers can calculate rewards based on number of inputs or total kb used:
you're paying for kilobytes with either coin age or fees no matter what. So
I think in practice it's not a big deal.
--047d7b41ce12db900e04fbf7c8d9
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blo=
ckquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #c=
cc solid;padding-left:1ex">This is a cool idea, but doesn't it generate=
some perverse incentives? If I'm running a full node and I want to pay=
CheapAir for some plane tickets, I'll want to pay in the greatest numb=
er of individual transactions possible</blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>Peers can calculate rewards based on number of inputs o=
r total kb used: you're paying for kilobytes with either coin age or fe=
es no matter what. So I think in practice it's not a big deal.</div>
</div></div></div>
--047d7b41ce12db900e04fbf7c8d9--
|
