1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
|
Return-Path: <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org (smtp2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.133])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44EE3C000B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 5 Mar 2022 23:20:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2491B40198
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 5 Mar 2022 23:20:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001,
SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: smtp2.osuosl.org (amavisd-new);
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com
Received: from smtp2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp2.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id DJUAXe2aNyQJ
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 5 Mar 2022 23:20:28 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail-40137.protonmail.ch (mail-40137.protonmail.ch
[185.70.40.137])
by smtp2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4580E4014D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 5 Mar 2022 23:20:28 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2022 23:20:20 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com;
s=protonmail3; t=1646522425;
bh=2vQfMyMiwEuMOR77isiiQKcB3lMz7w095ZTpH+HmwQI=;
h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:
From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID;
b=WQEUXf/ARMbgVfxOzrXjY34BTsQ+fSX8tnTIZ9is0mhVq3gzOoxFxtLfONFiQ/NW+
TD5N5/p13xSXgtHkymciYBkLvl5I9NwVFB0dMcb6IlJlrj8feAyYg5m0KslP5i9PWA
V90k2AgmyQQSkGKCu6+gvOYig8YzbleHUOu3OeDDjaMfdT4/FofdNGojMWl43+tbCn
ZK+IkvH8z+YgqXB5ZhLfc3eAL3Jri2sCBcmZhDI4RWAWu7WYnWaXOmVp+29QRwW68F
497FZ2YVW9Ut3tNEYV72MVYbo6qBM1lr0MlDWYdxoZc/YDOjFYXOo27FxKTfg4DSHv
mJzI80/+ykHtQ==
To: Russell O'Connor <roconnor@blockstream.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
From: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Reply-To: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <fSeOxQc5LeOte5w51zKLrC4041VjpVl9JYRX4MbLu2ma-vowoMeKI6Xem5CCZgNL1SJwvBdem9wJT8q52wV2bNxLS3ijLxDzfBq63sm-EuM=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMZUoKkjJrZuktNujt66YU=drm9GhsAgpg7A6CbrP+vOdjKO7A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20220304010442.GC3869@erisian.com.au>
<0yCTRKhBa9IPPg5J4HfKxraWJ4w6gUS5LRAoCPk01NpbYk-9R5zxAOmJO1Z8voUiatUJugYB6Oa9t1wFLbhQSgDie8hBzr0Z1EJVm6XGvMI=@protonmail.com>
<CAD5xwhiZx+dp46Gn23tQRKc5PgJHmaJ_HC-38VB5WdJjWVVc4g@mail.gmail.com>
<CAD5xwhh4G4p6cvWSCwoOUkS-atQyEdkP+J+Y4Sj29oncVM8KHg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAMZUoKkjJrZuktNujt66YU=drm9GhsAgpg7A6CbrP+vOdjKO7A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] bitcoin scripting and lisp
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2022 23:20:29 -0000
Good morning Russell,
> On Sat, Mar 5, 2022 at 8:41 AM Jeremy Rubin via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@=
lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> > It seems like a decent concept for exploration.
> >
> > AJ, I'd be interested to know what you've been able to build with Chia =
Lisp and what your experience has been... e.g. what does the Lightning Netw=
ork look like on Chia?
> >
> > One question that I have had is that it seems like to me that neither s=
implicity nor chia lisp would be particularly suited to a ZK prover...
>
> Not that I necessarily disagree with this statement, but I can say that I=
have experimented with compiling Simplicity to Boolean circuits.=C2=A0 It =
was a while ago, but I think the result of compiling my SHA256 program was =
within an order of magnitude of the hand made SHA256 circuit for bulletproo=
fs.
"Within" can mean "larger" or "smaller" in this context, which was it?
From what I understand, compilers for ZK-provable circuits are still not as=
effective as humans, so I would assume "larger", but I would be much inter=
ested if it is "smaller"!
Regards,
ZmnSCPxj
|
