summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/9f/231bb61d27b30b4a825153bf19412286fb2ed1
blob: faa82fce8e9d584ddc11579131c575c77105b5e8 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
Return-Path: <bztdlinux@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE50D9C
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu,  6 Apr 2017 05:46:30 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pg0-f47.google.com (mail-pg0-f47.google.com [74.125.83.47])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA3B7D0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu,  6 Apr 2017 05:46:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id 21so25815043pgg.1
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 05 Apr 2017 22:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
	h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
	:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=GgJpBLQ3BQ214V+wUvO1LsQMRgpydYlveOoMJTeaN5g=;
	b=Uaaug7MNaVaul824k90rIIEhiuiOYW3m60iTwPOzf6js1zWrUww22IBCo4EJR/HnWt
	gvoLVfkFgrFRpZ8zs81l+m5Q3MNnLUADx/zrzkF8cBPxSw+j8GOBdMZZfJduZxp6QYfe
	hfu7bzCHOvofCWl56NJW8v2+JSNhykfBy0c3pb3kIGrBaG8ZOhK8Iq8Xb6iEJS2eOLMj
	JtYQrH1jCx2uNTZZ0X2sUjDqrsR8aWK71SjhmtnZUf7Iv2Pmn2NEKk4wumZePpZxKDOY
	Hom/M1wL8xtU/jf7UdEiFKIdoa1ObFmc+38EmrZ5ZLogd/AjUFJqOUzFuXY4Mwzck4Ag
	ASjw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=GgJpBLQ3BQ214V+wUvO1LsQMRgpydYlveOoMJTeaN5g=;
	b=ZWWdubdkUs55X++fiamad+hSNjJEj2Je0BGz5u2npoxc6iOWjC8f6xd/2jpQ9LLu5n
	xsHqKvkYrdQWveHChliuZG5BSucHnD4eIn3QP/ITrL9W146eNPmXu7rFXVsVPbExeK8V
	4pDgj2HCMS1jQ9tY0++LN91W3HWJ3TeRHsQB0nq/BlEsQziY8hgDrAkJIk9qeGybCAB6
	3BwJZ+J+3R0aSduGb2gSfyTJDszJ96Eb4o+9PS6moBvSpAhCRiBWKpfaNboyLNUXwILl
	DKIzeJuJZdP5eNFnLzobf9aq1uO+Z3PB2W1vXlMHxhG0pAmBvBfNdDXwRKgzzTVX1TV9
	j9rw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3B+9IMC1HOPYXs27Th9HpBG7f0Q6s3sznURNH/svFXul4NXWXTA7PG9+1V27f8Ew==
X-Received: by 10.84.141.36 with SMTP id 33mr41193164plu.81.1491457590173;
	Wed, 05 Apr 2017 22:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.120] (107-202-144-143.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net.
	[107.202.144.143]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
	11sm1069963pgf.28.2017.04.05.22.46.29
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
	(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
	Wed, 05 Apr 2017 22:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <CAAS2fgR84898xD0nyq7ykJnB7qkdoCJYnFg6z5WZEUu0+-=mMA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20170406023123.GA1071@savin.petertodd.org>
	<CA+KqGkqSxeAUZFVFqM_QkEWcGFHgZXwGuOE==7HpXp1+D_Tj3Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20170406024910.GA1271@savin.petertodd.org>
	<CAFVRnyrqiNY_JOqhv2ysm2WsBMYsU3tTAASAtHzMbA68_9Yx8g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Thomas Daede <bztdlinux@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <b2822ef7-4224-5620-dee1-e71415ee5c62@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 22:46:27 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAFVRnyrqiNY_JOqhv2ysm2WsBMYsU3tTAASAtHzMbA68_9Yx8g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,
	HK_RANDOM_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 11:42:53 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: Inhibiting a covert attack on the
 Bitcoin POW function
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 05:46:31 -0000

On 04/05/2017 08:23 PM, David Vorick via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> I have a practical concern related to the amount of activation energy
> required to get something like this through. We are talking about
> implementing something that would remove tens to hundreds of millions of
> dollars of mining revenue for miners who have already gambled that this
> income would be available to them.

The proposed BIP only removes covert ASICBOOST. As long as the ASICs can
also do the non-covert ASICBOOST, it shouldn't have any impact on miner
revenue.