1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
|
Return-Path: <jgarzik@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FF3347E
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 17 Jul 2015 15:55:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com
[209.85.212.180])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECEFD108
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 17 Jul 2015 15:55:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by widic2 with SMTP id ic2so42621767wid.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:55:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=OI3K+cQ4czQT85nQBfQuP4VSxdWyEevhmVQYcgtrjhM=;
b=addsDcI9ufRtQxYkKs/mJJ7SrBaUu4QEj2IBblPtWgtqBRcisgp8ze33UwfJhyQSBP
iAx0YrCz3RcPBFGk7iWivR55VdbNlxpcdiqxzTwkDMu40wLiXuF/uyt+0OS3a6I21r1B
+a9DsFpzLZqTlAIzb66XItTaq/bSk2duvlc29nGMpZ35L4ZMTZ4+7IyrJVCNkxARuVTk
FdE1X1QzddXckuClD0etwI8hIsoeIHzOlFBRMNq5zZkKjnzQP/UoyaZdCz7F+AfkENt+
VG9v91+4YAZZMiYwalVwW9GFqjPRwjokKhx1IoNAzDGg+JKcKDp2dRqnyJMksSWKBoVX
JwTA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.249.100 with SMTP id yt4mr32858862wjc.0.1437148519663;
Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:55:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.28.140.196 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:55:19 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:55:19 -0400
Message-ID: <CADm_WcZKoMAhYvXbFMbE+5K9HOD75YkQu8_qTW4S6YN6ZMrfjA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@gmail.com>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c28b62010f07051b14373b
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 102 - kick the can down the road to 2MB
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 15:55:21 -0000
--001a11c28b62010f07051b14373b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Opening a mailing list thread on this BIP:
BIP PR: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/173
Code PR: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6451
The general intent of this BIP is as a minimum viable alternative plan to
my preferred proposal (BIP 100).
If agreement is not reached on a more comprehensive solution, then this
solution is at least available and a known quantity. A good backup plan.
Benefits: conservative increase. proves network can upgrade. permits
some added growth, while the community & market gathers data on how an
increased block size impacts privacy, security, centralization, transaction
throughput and other metrics. 2MB seems to be a Least Common Denominator
on an increase.
Costs: requires a hard fork. requires another hard fork down the road.
--001a11c28b62010f07051b14373b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Opening a mailing list thread on this BIP:</div><div>=
<br></div>BIP PR:=C2=A0<a href=3D"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/173"=
>https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/173</a><div>Code PR:=C2=A0<a href=3D"=
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6451">https://github.com/bitcoin/bi=
tcoin/pull/6451</a></div><div><br></div><div>The general intent of this BIP=
is as a minimum viable alternative plan to my preferred proposal (BIP 100)=
.</div><div><br></div><div>If agreement is not reached on a more comprehens=
ive solution, then this solution is at least available and a known quantity=
.=C2=A0 A good backup plan.</div><div><br></div><div>Benefits: =C2=A0conser=
vative increase. =C2=A0proves network can upgrade. =C2=A0permits some added=
growth, while the community & market gathers data on how an increased =
block size impacts privacy, security, centralization, transaction throughpu=
t and other metrics. =C2=A02MB seems to be a Least Common Denominator on an=
increase.</div><div><br></div><div>Costs: =C2=A0requires a hard fork. =C2=
=A0requires another hard fork down the road.</div><div><br></div><div><br><=
/div></div>
--001a11c28b62010f07051b14373b--
|
