1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
|
Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <mark@monetize.io>) id 1VQLCH-0000sE-Gk
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sun, 29 Sep 2013 17:54:21 +0000
Received: from mail-pd0-f175.google.com ([209.85.192.175])
by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1VQLCF-0000kd-R1
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sun, 29 Sep 2013 17:54:21 +0000
Received: by mail-pd0-f175.google.com with SMTP id q10so4647616pdj.20
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Sun, 29 Sep 2013 10:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent
:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=fT8IoUDAyql52CRIJVDF2kHW8uXxxYoYFWynoRax49g=;
b=m1zSOXbqqd4qDjnlUqbCX6B6F2pRObJ/F5V2mG1caqZt6IgBFkoRqOTvj397NePlX9
fcOafqdIluNT/gvEGW/avwqB8umcRckk6tPsnifJHaQm48pCCpHl4IBxCxCLoVWsCjQl
Ga/ihMLHewoYfgHZnkLzQpkgimydB7a0u+YNH0yTJ+oRKF/eLJv7fumQUCRcAwLq7GN/
Pw4sZqjblBL0M2cTb7GO3nN/qafMacxgVUYL186JDpDgAguhttNbwkbkH11G83WNuj+d
0eDTLYXFRYPkH0hWjGsXM2+6ltbpjV2YAwIfCK24s4F0b81A+PcefCl6pgODqRfW1U8A
HKuw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnwktV+Zw/jUUCk1M4jfRi0TrbRv5ebcd9TcduM0Y3XHafXYT1BwOU10+Pg3BZzyfENsfov
X-Received: by 10.66.156.199 with SMTP id wg7mr23305170pab.81.1380476944421;
Sun, 29 Sep 2013 10:49:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phobos.local (50-0-36-188.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net. [50.0.36.188])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
im2sm21843359pbd.31.1969.12.31.16.00.00
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Sun, 29 Sep 2013 10:49:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5248680C.60404@monetize.io>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 10:49:00 -0700
From: Mark Friedenbach <mark@monetize.io>
Organization: Monetize.io Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adam Back <adam@cypherspace.org>,
Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
References: <CAKaEYhLvqT6nkbupEEgR1d9dMP4-pA7xQbBqPDbREiDDV7c0rQ@mail.gmail.com>
<2c70dbfc173749cf4198c591f19a7d33@astutium.com>
<CAH+ZByHs00+Cpx5bwybgV3G9=CBfHaHKg7AV9ytywKNAjFVM6g@mail.gmail.com>
<CABsx9T29T+thSeF-xVk+prfeO7ZJQbX=n=tAURqEKQsVtcBpQg@mail.gmail.com>
<20130929093708.GA16561@netbook.cypherspace.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130929093708.GA16561@netbook.cypherspace.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/,
no trust [209.85.192.175 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.0 T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT Fill in a short form with personal
information
X-Headers-End: 1VQLCF-0000kd-R1
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] smart contracts -- possible use case? yes
or no?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 17:54:21 -0000
This kind of thing - providing external audits of customer accounts
without revealing private data - would be generally useful beyond
taxation. If you have any solutions, I'd be interested to hear them
(although bitcoin-dev is probably not the right place yet).
Mark
On 9/29/13 2:37 AM, Adam Back wrote:
> taxation in particular there are examples where even the political sphere
> accepts significantly anonymous taxation. eg for europeans with certain
> types of investment in a swiss bank, the swiss bank sends however many
> million as a single payment across all users per european country to their
> passport home country (minus 25% cut for the swiss government). Perhaps
> such things could be possible for bitcoin. Again I think bitcoin talk would
> be a good place for such a discussion if that was the OP question
> indirectly.
|
