1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
|
Return-Path: <prabhatkr@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9E0DE28
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:40:00 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com (mail-ob0-f169.google.com
[209.85.214.169])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5175B102
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:40:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by obkg7 with SMTP id g7so16075444obk.3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 27 Aug 2015 06:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=nyVvrjCUJM7ryjxh0SPYLEKcCvTbc/XD+Y7XzQfYdf0=;
b=M4kWTyG2HEsYdt5kFGsDEvG2pKweNAjWrmJYKLRGU4FT+pS9wePw7mXhby8TmWxiiB
pYeQDuiIG0h2UG1LNf8lx0lsFrpFg2/yXD8gMKY5B/AqH5zdpj+wI8wJOVNdfaYXb49n
1CoENpOxx3JFF3pzoW8yGi5YB7szMb85wIarfLbVJRqY1obKeIBCJg8tbWJ8QgswcxLP
dQqtrIWRS677vlMwmAVLLY6SfPBQKTc3e9UxH802hxJ2O1Nmc89mJEt7KEeZqNxHE1wx
SVFy+zdIlzk6QXi5HD4r4ssdAMrleMqy+CJ0Vyiw6QErzzgaKM5/tLC5KIKT/07laoa7
NwWw==
X-Received: by 10.182.214.9 with SMTP id nw9mr2459028obc.33.1440682799781;
Thu, 27 Aug 2015 06:39:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.45.214 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 06:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T06Pot0QqZ9bbok6_FH5kyDh+-QV=fdUGma=cmr=iESsg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALoZ_LG7POrwNqtG9prvG_1T3+OcWNo9cKbiwHDu9xP85zqOEA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAC0TF==iEPzMpjcGO+ukV6rVkM-4yH3jX0Obu4Aint1eWzK5bQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CALoZ_LE4eWO6NaP2nR4PsRBP8p_u1uhgs1PSMo7hiVf_e2=CvA@mail.gmail.com>
<fcbeee9eacd7a58b950f965eb1450180@xbt.hk>
<CALoZ_LHU7LDywjiNX53Z=5i4fkiLbRwBpCwpzTB0beWW=UHN8w@mail.gmail.com>
<CABsx9T06Pot0QqZ9bbok6_FH5kyDh+-QV=fdUGma=cmr=iESsg@mail.gmail.com>
From: prabhat <prabhatkr@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 19:09:40 +0530
Message-ID: <CALoZ_LF_2pbczmHm5ZGc4=ffDqTmcoAYZzkFTUUV9a05q6wTfQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ff1c9e283df78051e4b1abf
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIPS proposal for implementing AML-KYC in bitcoin
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:40:00 -0000
--e89a8ff1c9e283df78051e4b1abf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Fine point.
So where is the solution? What to do?
Prabhat Kumar Singh
Prabhat Kumar Singh
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Have you talked with anybody at the Bitcoin Foundation about this proposal?
>
> As Chief Scientist of the Foundation, I am strongly opposed to any
> proposal that puts the Foundation in a position of centralized authority,
> so this is unacceptable: "The Bitcoin Foundation will act as fair play
> party and enforcement body to control the misuse of vast financial powers
> which bitcoin has."
>
> The idea that a central organization can be trusted to keep secrets secure
> is just fundamentally wrong. In the very recent past we have seen
> government organizations fail in that task (the NSA, the OPM) and we see
> commercial organizations that SHOULD be highly motivated to do a good job
> also fail (e.g. the Ashley Madison leak).
>
> Even if it were technically possible, I would be opposed because
> decentralization is a bedrock principle of Bitcoin.
>
> --
> --
> Gavin Andresen
>
--e89a8ff1c9e283df78051e4b1abf
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"font-size:12.8000001907349px">Fi=
ne point.<div><br></div><div>So where is the solution? What to do?</div></d=
iv><div class=3D"gmail_extra" style=3D"font-size:12.8000001907349px"><br cl=
ear=3D"all"><div>Prabhat Kumar Singh</div></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_e=
xtra"><br clear=3D"all"><div><div class=3D"gmail_signature">Prabhat Kumar S=
ingh<br><br></div></div>
<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Gavin Andre=
sen <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:gavinandresen@gmail.com" target=
=3D"_blank">gavinandresen@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote cl=
ass=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;p=
adding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr">Have you talked with anybody at the Bitco=
in Foundation about this proposal?<div><br></div><div>As Chief Scientist of=
the Foundation, I am strongly opposed to any proposal that puts the Founda=
tion in a position of centralized authority, so this is unacceptable: "=
;The Bitcoin Foundation will act as fair play party and enforcement body to=
control the misuse of vast financial powers which bitcoin has."</div>=
<div><br></div><div>The idea that a central organization can be trusted to =
keep secrets secure is just fundamentally wrong. In the very recent past we=
have seen government organizations fail in that task (the NSA, the OPM) an=
d we see commercial organizations that SHOULD be highly motivated to do a g=
ood job also fail (e.g. the Ashley Madison leak).</div><div><br></div><div>=
Even if it were technically possible, I would be opposed because decentrali=
zation is a bedrock principle of Bitcoin.</div><span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font=
color=3D"#888888"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div><br></div>-- <br><div>--=
<br>Gavin Andresen<br></div>
</div></font></span></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
--e89a8ff1c9e283df78051e4b1abf--
|
