1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
|
Return-Path: <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9DD21136
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 17 Sep 2015 13:59:46 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wi0-f173.google.com (mail-wi0-f173.google.com
[209.85.212.173])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 132F9277
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 17 Sep 2015 13:59:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so28688642wic.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 17 Sep 2015 06:59:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=sJqsxknokH6leF+G5dogkoU/DykHka3zbXqem3s2uZM=;
b=EmJWw/0OTphVBbs51QXZFbYtuX606xv9/3TvvQmd6zIJa4QJV4Osvt8HextSgYHfUk
QpRtJa3fdSuhBLXN+Db9uBZJmq46/ewsq88KNLqYrMTAKvs11nLCFmkWacLA9GYIapf1
BeQ6GVOEuLacRnPDKvTvQdrlhFPk8BtRTXqKw/JAzUN8FfaMgHajUAnaAiXKOAZyFKBn
MQjTtvR8qDi0J/R/tapewAaSJZNudkkyjk7qUb/aAAaYiKSqLdtfzQax8cl6vumHDndG
20vCOqmYNGuj7Nq/AeKQL1/wXWfRGJkBqbfGO5QORXXZ7aXW9cqHBIv/FVgh/bScHzXw
NPLg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnMDA/Z0bFX06h6SPTKgSBQvNQ6TOcW5ySwJWqBc2s00sTBhCJCi4dVOLP9jXdqVYb7CVPu
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.58.40 with SMTP id n8mr69685362wjq.134.1442498383960;
Thu, 17 Sep 2015 06:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.48.12 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 06:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAE-z3OWu7HgHh=8nAZMfJaekL03HHXvHrkRBho=aBAoRtHR9Eg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87mvwqb132.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
<CAE-z3OWLteNyBWuYSkYLZNteOGjDch_fViOV2kpWCaZkXsbu4w@mail.gmail.com>
<87r3lyjewl.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
<CABm2gDqh=Dv2Ygctg+jEt61N_nJDRBMqdZypSPtmfM2QrY4AYQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAE-z3OXATJ6HGKqU=vxc8k-yCMAMwXiWQJxvO3D_O256_ZODtw@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDppFsTbh3JtdJkAkV_GzKFYAOLiEmtQPCgS9O6b7eWFuw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAE-z3OXbUhsyzd=8hxzFAST9rEQyTg9whn+CMh92S0FMdLH4ug@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDo4f6bpJeobwRyoukKw9t=ApuRtHMYWpWFXjv9=K7aFyA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAE-z3OUyNpmG5uhSCExf39zmmB-b9xDrn+gkp3UFeg7M3G8E5g@mail.gmail.com>
<CABm2gDphLRQ6huhxvcx1YvbsmaBHA_sk6MEZF+hgdxoC472P+w@mail.gmail.com>
<CDB1F26E-FE26-44F3-9A86-CDAE33A51B8B@gmail.com>
<CAE-z3OWu7HgHh=8nAZMfJaekL03HHXvHrkRBho=aBAoRtHR9Eg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 15:59:43 +0200
Message-ID: <CABm2gDr=cfXZgA8HUik-8eSS8QgcB1mndJnvNrK8-NcY6yjPYw@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>
To: Tier Nolan <tier.nolan@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BIP Proposal] Version bits with timeout and
delay.
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 13:59:46 -0000
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Tier Nolan via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> The advantage of enforcing the rule when 75% is reached (but only for blocks
> with the bit set) is that miners get early notification that they have
> implemented the rule incorrectly. They might produce blocks that they
> think are fine, but which aren't.
I'm still unconvinced, but thanks, this is what I was asking for.
|
