1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
|
Return-Path: <prabhatkr@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D036414A0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:28:48 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-oi0-f54.google.com (mail-oi0-f54.google.com
[209.85.218.54])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44E391D2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:28:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by oigm66 with SMTP id m66so56831591oig.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 31 Aug 2015 04:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=8/uLGMsPU0Kgi8Ky7kxWf30+JiEt35LGtj6O6BtOV8g=;
b=YDs8WDTuNQ7lYC5cMSPrPSUCL1+RXPIdqQ7/yG3gPZVimajoNg0Af2PQkih165TLvv
+MyT1DWTxOM9q+cgjObosL+2x/sHg719vUz1AJqAJWjNV4IgK1scRIEjVmIAcUZ+BpsB
xL6bfPoyZcuNShIrk70hSA8ePklzLnzFmoCaa+zNOlM1a6K/2RzpoSGQo/JMxyuoYp+j
d88Pq0Yv3oFxR8Ah1kwmUW5L/OxzDCylWH8X19t6VLXBosiZXvU4p6DDe92elEml5izI
foOglbwDRPh9tE0K+2jY7NAVs/g1jZXJ1YRqSQnF1ElKHGrB3ej0aQzc9J4Bq9y4lQOM
0Qfw==
X-Received: by 10.202.215.8 with SMTP id o8mr12591590oig.47.1441020523483;
Mon, 31 Aug 2015 04:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.188.193 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 04:28:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55E2FB70.5070805@sky-ip.org>
References: <CALoZ_LG7POrwNqtG9prvG_1T3+OcWNo9cKbiwHDu9xP85zqOEA@mail.gmail.com>
<55DFC0C6.80607@riseup.net> <55E2FB70.5070805@sky-ip.org>
From: prabhat <prabhatkr@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 16:58:23 +0530
Message-ID: <CALoZ_LEwaYap0j7Gzzk7R3m+zTwVWTigYwY3M8Jp+P2AYK9aqg@mail.gmail.com>
To: s7r@sky-ip.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d38026a9be9051e99bc83
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, URIBL_BLACK autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIPS proposal for implementing AML-KYC in bitcoin
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:28:48 -0000
--001a113d38026a9be9051e99bc83
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Thanks for nice decentralized discussion.
This wasn't and isn't a parody.
Mining is insecure (for society) and security is passive.
All the raised points are proven by esteemed members themselves.
Closing from my side.
Thanks,
God Bless,
Bye
Prabhat Kumar Singh
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 6:17 PM, s7r <s7r@sky-ip.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> 2^256 x _NO_
>
> On 8/28/2015 5:00 AM, odinn via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > No.
> >
> > On 08/27/2015 01:10 AM, prabhat via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >
> >> I am proposing to create a AML-KYC module to control the network
> >> and also qualify use cases in OFAC compliant way. Here is the
> >> attached doc.
> >
> >> Please provide your feedback and suggestions.
> >
> >> Best, Prabhat Kumar Singh
> >
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
>
> iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJV4vtvAAoJEIN/pSyBJlsRLhgIANLoG2/NNuc+sAMZnSojWQf7
> UxJeOLFE7XXOCwDeUPfbgJ6JxYMTQwqT/mOAAPkHoAwm+k7SHUy+MuxTGnlui4n7
> hKtRPdZ1ibYeBLV3CBQb9PEN2Ma7Djjh2LtBcbueF19w3j95NOSnTl9P3jOfc8kW
> x2rAEoZFJeJUOE/prbedrzQ8wSHm9ekt4BXiDnUaR3Xvvp/NuVZ9+eWJT+lWS4fR
> 16zFQZPMYP6o2evnhluAJCTvP0q0Imz6d4I0Mryi2hLDX964sLpxP0tK+ASbtzwV
> CknfKeSjwpZ116MMDSfgnya17AYc0o6RWl6XjAgciPAMJFQnhhSKzLNV9898AT0=
> =It5v
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
--001a113d38026a9be9051e99bc83
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">Thanks for nice decentralized discussion.<div>This wasn=
9;t and isn't a parody.</div><div>Mining is insecure (for society) and =
security is passive.=C2=A0</div><div>All the raised points are proven by es=
teemed members themselves.</div><div><br></div><div>Closing from my side.</=
div><div>Thanks,</div><div>God Bless,</div><div>Bye</div></div><div class=
=3D"gmail_extra"><br clear=3D"all"><div><div class=3D"gmail_signature">Prab=
hat Kumar Singh<br><br></div></div>
<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 6:17 PM, s7r <span d=
ir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:s7r@sky-ip.org" target=3D"_blank">s7r@sky-=
ip.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"=
margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">-----BEGIN P=
GP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>
Hash: SHA256<br>
<br>
2^256 x _NO_<br>
<span class=3D""><br>
On 8/28/2015 5:00 AM, odinn via bitcoin-dev wrote:<br>
> No.<br>
><br>
> On 08/27/2015 01:10 AM, prabhat via bitcoin-dev wrote:<br>
>> Hi,<br>
><br>
>> I am proposing to create a AML-KYC module to control the network<b=
r>
>> and also qualify use cases in OFAC compliant way. Here is the<br>
>> attached doc.<br>
><br>
>> Please provide your feedback and suggestions.<br>
><br>
>> Best, Prabhat Kumar Singh<br>
><br>
</span>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)<br>
<br>
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJV4vtvAAoJEIN/pSyBJlsRLhgIANLoG2/NNuc+sAMZnSojWQf7<br>
UxJeOLFE7XXOCwDeUPfbgJ6JxYMTQwqT/mOAAPkHoAwm+k7SHUy+MuxTGnlui4n7<br>
hKtRPdZ1ibYeBLV3CBQb9PEN2Ma7Djjh2LtBcbueF19w3j95NOSnTl9P3jOfc8kW<br>
x2rAEoZFJeJUOE/prbedrzQ8wSHm9ekt4BXiDnUaR3Xvvp/NuVZ9+eWJT+lWS4fR<br>
16zFQZPMYP6o2evnhluAJCTvP0q0Imz6d4I0Mryi2hLDX964sLpxP0tK+ASbtzwV<br>
CknfKeSjwpZ116MMDSfgnya17AYc0o6RWl6XjAgciPAMJFQnhhSKzLNV9898AT0=3D<br>
=3DIt5v<br>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
--001a113d38026a9be9051e99bc83--
|
