1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <jgarzik@exmulti.com>) id 1Qdvdx-0000V9-FU
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 05 Jul 2011 02:45:45 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from mail-iy0-f175.google.com ([209.85.210.175])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1Qdvdw-00079f-5M
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 05 Jul 2011 02:45:45 +0000
Received: by iym10 with SMTP id 10so6848884iym.34
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Mon, 04 Jul 2011 19:45:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.115.142 with SMTP id i14mr6032260ibq.139.1309833938450;
Mon, 04 Jul 2011 19:45:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.37.3 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 19:45:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [99.173.148.118]
In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T2-htzpQPxrNqq1Efow2tuUdm5AQGOh0MS0MXvH5pD_5g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1309801974.3423.80.camel@Desktop666>
<CABsx9T31ZuQHKwcNnb9-NpaCA6c43PXVZ+Tc+GZ=2Wkz08enHw@mail.gmail.com>
<1309811972.29355.19.camel@Desktop666>
<1309828239.29355.28.camel@Desktop666>
<CABsx9T2-htzpQPxrNqq1Efow2tuUdm5AQGOh0MS0MXvH5pD_5g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 22:45:38 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+8xBpd06DJ_0+OHRDsbzkecfG1+-ubXb2eiVRiSn6GT53ZDSQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti.com>
To: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
X-Headers-End: 1Qdvdw-00079f-5M
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Encrypted Wallet Backward Compatibility
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 02:45:45 -0000
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com> w=
rote:
>> All that needs to happen for that is to agree on either
>> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/378 or
>> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/381'
>
> I don't think 0.3.24 "needs" either of those pulls. =A0Fixing
> downgrade-to-0.3.24 is low on the priority list, because
> downgrade-to-something-before-0.3.24 is just about as likely, and that
> has to do something mostly reasonable.
Yeah, same thoughts here.
> I just pulled https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/379 "Do not use
> comma as thousands separator", and pulled a block-chain lock-in at
> block 13444. =A0Those were the only issues I think really need to be in
> 0.3.24.
Tagged -tip as -rc2.
Bug reports are mostly quiet, so maybe we can even get the release
before you leave.
--=20
Jeff Garzik
exMULTI, Inc.
jgarzik@exmulti.com
|
