1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
|
Return-Path: <voisine@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43427BB3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 27 Jun 2015 19:55:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-qc0-f173.google.com (mail-qc0-f173.google.com
[209.85.216.173])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC3D815F
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 27 Jun 2015 19:55:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qczu9 with SMTP id u9so9844786qcz.3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 27 Jun 2015 12:55:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=pSuUBWZZzO+73WS+OYLnfSLef27/DplGjlrf/UQ5zzk=;
b=zCC/bB+Xv43WqujqcOv+VVd2QJzIOj26ss/2buVWfrybvZ6M/OlL4rYtEHF/c1TNCg
YzTvnAaJ12PSM8zUBlX43vWuknX6FDJq81QKzgTFHT5y2AA9e1HM5BBEWyT8KaRvnFQZ
WghPs3FKp6hvwSdNjNHaQVhn9fxZ5mvhZFXKimTXVbIUMznsTDQsjYuCQhGn2/dqoj2A
aLMsnsLZVagg/6D6upls3cJiMNB5Oj+gNzwYYW+RJuk6WoBmzBDd2ZbYy37Qv22p4GRT
Z3fDcTSb9DNrqWVsyXAh9cmPgjKgszanvZLd967VPB47QMfBH5TYe9268cOFplUmYrw6
rGyg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.55.25.40 with SMTP id k40mr17360270qkh.30.1435434927970;
Sat, 27 Jun 2015 12:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.91.37 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 12:55:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <558E78CB.7070207@mail.bihthai.net>
References: <CAPg+sBjOj9eXiDG0F6G54SVKkStF_1HRu2wzGqtFF5X_NAWy4w@mail.gmail.com>
<20150627074259.GA25420@amethyst.visucore.com>
<20150627095501.C59B541A40@smtp.hushmail.com>
<558E78CB.7070207@mail.bihthai.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 12:55:27 -0700
Message-ID: <CACq0ZD5WV-J1H7QA0F2wnErXVFJ3MSxWtQidPhVwaxauoHQz_A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Aaron Voisine <voisine@gmail.com>
To: venzen@mail.bihthai.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1147eb8cfae0ae0519853cb8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] The need for larger blocks
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 19:55:29 -0000
--001a1147eb8cfae0ae0519853cb8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 3:19 AM, Venzen Khaosan <venzen@mail.bihthai.net>
wrote:
>
> That is a false assumption. Given the increased adoption of Bitcoin by
> users and businesses during the past year, does the price chart
> reflect greater value or price? Of course not, the price chart is at
> terminal lows. Fact not fiction.
>
You're not taking speculative cycles into account. For most of 2013 the
price was in the $100 range. Adoption as a store-of-value is what
determines the price over the long term, as with any monetary commodity.
--001a1147eb8cfae0ae0519853cb8
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 3:19 AM, Venzen Khaosan <span dir=
=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:venzen@mail.bihthai.net" target=3D"_blank">v=
enzen@mail.bihthai.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class=3D"gmail_extra">=
<div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margi=
n:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
That is a false assumption. Given the increased adoption of Bitcoin by<br>
users and businesses during the past year, does the price chart<br>
reflect greater value or price? Of course not, the price chart is at<br>
terminal lows. Fact not fiction.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>You=
9;re not taking speculative cycles into account. For most of 2013 the price=
was in the $100 range. Adoption as a store-of-value is what determines the=
price over the long term, as with any monetary commodity.</div></div></div=
></div>
--001a1147eb8cfae0ae0519853cb8--
|
