1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
|
Return-Path: <slurms@gmx.us>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA49A489
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:43:03 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45EE1172
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:43:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [115.187.143.132] by 3capp-mailcom-bs01.server.lan (via
HTTP); Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:43:00 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <trinity-387914cc-b201-48e9-8eb0-8708a8e95199-1437730980193@3capp-mailcom-bs01>
From: "Slurms MacKenzie" <slurms@gmx.us>
To: thomas@thomaszander.se
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:43:00 +0200
Importance: normal
Sensitivity: Normal
In-Reply-To: <1536871.OeviznBiyx@coldstorage>
References: <CADm_WcZKoMAhYvXbFMbE+5K9HOD75YkQu8_qTW4S6YN6ZMrfjA@mail.gmail.com>
<201507172029.17056.luke@dashjr.org>, <1536871.OeviznBiyx@coldstorage>
X-UI-Message-Type: mail
X-Priority: 3
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:aGoDnlBOjHfe7G2WC2pNz2vr4thPYbarhA+2TZSOs4K
PGURrvGc8G8wz0pF5GV6009E35lRPpLXc6Q53nzawDdqvrvrlp
tR5gqXmx/g+Vsj1jBqTmdxmOrVmEgwPAJTelKpsH8JvsKVPxpo
DNXLg2cVN3kP3va36pFhiJ3MfHFFbvBbI58hYWLRSblChFwJ9b
r6E+hR/9jI9CcIR20Of3oalGNysh4heoRqZZmV8SYJ7nSteX3I
If/7Fzdrvr9bJhy9Q4csQ4Uam+cTawf+EYaR+IPe96S8M9K+UU
oOoOnA9RYeW8bfFEoXTzOelSIgn
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:4+CywGh/Xhg=:1ggJMFJi17qj0wBwXORcKy
lxX2e4OxmeQIOTNCYyeX9bHp/sP2UcMepLoxVqYuja7EaNgd7wAWchTMXOVgylEK50y+PgFmz
Zude2XRasfOi7UBwnsz3XHAdKIOlNX1fcngIUyAdYh5wbryPKT0T6TGJU2PBOA7ph/EU6b95G
8wqS0SeA74nVpQhkd5jl8fxgvFZmrb6qVZdRsIEEgfLARHnQ06gDCWAug9pSGwfwzet8Tz3Gt
NDzEVAd7yoQLvQ05EjRXCK4FcUJhHNugMgpNPT9F44RxCDuuihOqkcE26zvAWHwW143RBfkQA
KXdNGqEH0znuPcxrJ/LcvA9BWkUqyaxbhbnX9o3U/gCG1emD9GnW/gkpI+6AnLhN2M4ES4buu
S0KlB8bFKVqp1YsRVKBSOOu/NQFZUz4E2BwsObMLaJu6vDS2in10xyWw8gmTn4O+6uH6phyVf
1jR8/rvDWQ==
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 102 - kick the can down the road to 2MB
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:43:04 -0000
> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 at 10:52 AM
> From: "Thomas Zander via bitcoin-dev" <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
> To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 102 - kick the can down the road to 2MB
>
>
> The reference to bandwidth increases makes no sense, the bandwidth in most of
> the world is already far exceeding the 8Mb limit. Not everyone lives where you
> live :)
>
> In Germany you buy a 150Mbit connection for a flatrate and a cheap monthly
> rate, for instance. Not saying that Germany is where all the miners are, but
> since 150Mbit allows one to comfortably have 16 megabyte blocks, it is a good
> example of how far off Luke's calculations are from real-world.
I'll have better stats available soon, but this does not reflect the current state of the network.
Only 4% of my initial crawl presented bandwidth above your stated 18MB/s.
|
