1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
|
Return-Path: <user@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C142FDA3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 23 Jul 2019 20:53:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 00:16:25 by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail148098.authsmtp.com (outmail148098.authsmtp.com
[62.13.148.98])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D11E775
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 23 Jul 2019 20:53:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c237.authsmtp.com (mail-c237.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.237])
by punt15.authsmtp.com. (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x6NKasst057684;
Tue, 23 Jul 2019 21:36:54 +0100 (BST)
(envelope-from user@petertodd.org)
Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com
[52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x6NKaqcK088837
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO);
Tue, 23 Jul 2019 21:36:53 +0100 (BST)
(envelope-from user@petertodd.org)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 479C8401C5;
Tue, 23 Jul 2019 20:36:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 4B83C2006C; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 16:36:50 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 16:36:50 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Peter <dizzle@pointbiz.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <20190723203650.ligimeie6moqfg5v@petertodd.org>
References: <CADsWqbvFFg=GpO3FRpMhJP+2YtF9Qf3Gj+MSJcy=6QRSC6AqAg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vomkg5jbtcqzt3cv"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CADsWqbvFFg=GpO3FRpMhJP+2YtF9Qf3Gj+MSJcy=6QRSC6AqAg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2)
X-Server-Quench: 9b65d86d-ad89-11e9-b106-8434971169dc
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZIVwkA IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aAdMdAEUEkAYAgsB Am8bWVVeU1t7XGc7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq
T0pMXVMcXAMWek1A VWUeWhF6dAIIfXZy YQhrDHZeCEx8IVss
FkZdCGwHMG59OmEf Vl1QcwBQeQRLfxlM PgMxNiYHcQ5VPz4z
GA41ejw8IwAXAiVJ SQYMKxo5RlwGViI7 DxwDBjwlGUBNbSE0
KBljIFcHEUpZHEQ2 LVY7WFQXexUDaEVS Ek9EHStFT///
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1024:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 11:36:19 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core to disable Bloom-based Filtering by
default
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 20:53:21 -0000
--vomkg5jbtcqzt3cv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 02:52:10PM -0400, Peter via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> I believe two wallets. Andreas' Android Bitcoin wallet and BRD are
> significant users of node_bloom.
>=20
> Privacy is a matter of individual choice in the current protocol. Why not
> let people provide this network service? I don't see why it should be
> end-of-life if it provides value.
With that patch people are still free to choose to provide bloom filtering
services by setting -peerbloomfilters=3D1
> I believe there's a network security obtained by having a large quantity =
of
> people following the Bitcoin headers based on longest weighted chain. As a
> means of nullifying potential miner initiated hard forks (like S2X).
There really isn't due to sybil attacks; we already have good reason to bel=
ieve
that the Bitcoin network is subject to them by deanonymization/chainanalysis
services.
Indeed there's a good argument that creating services that are vulnerable to
sybil attacks encourages them by making them succesful at something. That
creates its own risks, for instance the risk that the sybil attacker will
themselves screw up and cause a bunch of nodes to go offline at once.
--=20
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
--vomkg5jbtcqzt3cv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEFcyURjhyM68BBPYTJIFAPaXwkfsFAl03b90ACgkQJIFAPaXw
kfto/Qf/VF/0LSq8Uw15YzoR9wynw/2zJvrm5YCy71Ju06/QHXLA84wXk89uQDUv
Kg2eAptgkQvQ56qDBNXHv2TBaAby14hm2euq+DpHPWwtSIvuHDMH0bE879vzaatN
znB+2pjX0WWUkuclmDe4jaZ0qPgup1f5WkJlcQSpyfK4WqyIUF1VHoG1wRtB3PyX
/kRpl5GydDTBZepcdy+eWG4i2IpVk3l7pdPtVlwQfnpkzZIQjuKEzLawVTdW4Uc1
FJPrLuJCZtITEe+lxn8dVzHLaO6J26vheDLfzwbSo6QlEERQLW4cG3Wm6jee6lS7
WeigJQkOiraGO26k9Yrc0dfemNLpgw==
=S/sE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--vomkg5jbtcqzt3cv--
|
