1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
|
Return-Path: <simon@bitcartel.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3724FBC3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 30 Jun 2015 22:55:09 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pd0-f180.google.com (mail-pd0-f180.google.com
[209.85.192.180])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE31D11F
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 30 Jun 2015 22:55:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pdjd13 with SMTP id d13so13714544pdj.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to
:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=/V7P3BgpnsEPkAwCiGVaG/SsqtNyqfM06ZpJAzWY4Wg=;
b=eHewhomsb8ivr85xQ87W4CvE6/J1uhk4QQikHnvIvajcRu9jwmIhPGthwVhCbjR1Xj
5dbLdTfe/4IAgWXtFzWcWcFd9twu0D7iaTwxi6KKGFAqWFmEKyvBw4oo1bcN85imSu9b
8o8klMpb+u5f4aboPN3fezKW22/NoY/lOOrHi6yPk5PQRCfohDpTYKSCyEp82VcD2D5Q
wUo3LlVbEs5bFRL3dqPTyHWqz2owu2sYxK+AaSBRshFREg8rRSyH93YSRxPFnBRMTo/H
gdeG2HTqjP3wk0Oul2LyRWoPovfoJ7obPphd946l6GAI1g2SxkfP6WrOZaZsaQAQHVKv
E6Jw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnbhxLuBPoUmo/Z3omr8T4olGqFEg7e61nFgZGdsRaSxQNFMn7MP9PbDNxMw/yjR+0aAMcZ
X-Received: by 10.68.189.42 with SMTP id gf10mr48472260pbc.55.1435704908468;
Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.31] (173-11-70-186-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net.
[173.11.70.186]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
fb3sm46641911pbd.91.2015.06.30.15.55.07
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:55:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <55931E4A.80402@bitcartel.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:55:06 -0700
From: Simon Liu <simon@bitcartel.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adam Back <adam@cypherspace.org>, Michael Naber <mickeybob@gmail.com>
References: <CALqxMTG1=+F8DSeRAThtTSmj4F3YhgUiCbqJ1CfBy9Z-LLZvSQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALqxMTG1=+F8DSeRAThtTSmj4F3YhgUiCbqJ1CfBy9Z-LLZvSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] block-size tradeoffs & hypothetical alternatives
(Re: Block size increase oppositionists: please clearly define what you
need done to increase block size to a static 8MB, and help do it)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 22:55:09 -0000
My understanding is that BIP 101 has working code to raise the block
size and is ready for evaluation today.
When will Lightning and Sidechains be ready so that a fair and
controlled test can be made?
On 06/30/2015 12:54 PM, Adam Back wrote:
> People who would like to try the higher tier data-center and
> throughput by high bandwidth use route should in my opinion run that
> experiment as a layer 2 side-chain or analogous. There are a few ways
> to do that. And it would be appropriate to my mind that we discuss
> them here also.
>
> An experiment like that could run in parallel with lightning, maybe it
> could be done faster, or offer different trade-offs, so could be an
> interesting and useful thing to see work on.
>
|
