1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
|
Return-Path: <li3939108@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1982EFC8
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 23 Jan 2018 00:38:13 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D1DB134
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 23 Jan 2018 00:38:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id 143so19565969wma.5
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:38:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=poODh4p0tKoAthpHHYxkd7suzBopgs8BGm6q1BCgS/E=;
b=Edy3N4ALp8Xary9Xr4vQbU2eMQjHu2yH2i9Sg4d6KaujrOgym6yoA9X6UO77jna1LE
dv3AuKkQdlrpDLR4WRVr9sCQYYTv1AezqtrHb0pXExiUSPeRbRnUoq0kmJJxZ0s83cVi
Z9i0K75GlLC+WYHc5mtmf0/WLiZ11NCap52sExWhF+4i28lnHyzp+/juiFnE9tL93IBv
o/ilQ/z9v+8zjnlsH32WuZs2NZl0dyxN9ov2K4xvvrdlQSdAYCI6JZvFdM4dGEv6qiva
erBcZI++iZmmWG9utmh9gq1HITZhEWUk265aVrBntr96WI5ei/YbZIsBJoHV9VHU23DW
IlPA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=poODh4p0tKoAthpHHYxkd7suzBopgs8BGm6q1BCgS/E=;
b=MVjLnntJuOH9Z5eWEMXn6vYA6fjJESO0Xy9n8PlM3/X0IxNRSgDxb+1k33+gCjkgIF
tvixMpb2oIdYWu+vfvKo17b7ix+JMNXzRDJvHycq1jozBys5jBLlf6ZGyXISjlxzn6ZY
ujSb6Bh7O9FPHUSE+HWlqVUjk+JBtj9tJC24G6NZFo8LNMtLXRn9GrDIV57nXmsifeqV
+JCl6mfWENcOgfsG1YNeWZUnZz17mFXleukC6I2rsfB1fVOH7ElJhy0Hbdk23VOaPp0q
j/a2weuDTbsrvzHiasH17m+M4Ag4WC0ZnLEwfvQpE1z6B9RJuTf+52zTaeQSHh0VB/cB
Af5w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytc1culx3I7yQlyKqL8gFsK4bC45DhnBN77ubP7zzTM4nuB+nZYD
OZK3Q/ZHebHWXCxdRCAnUlD+KFdN27wQ2Ukar7Z0hQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224lhAxgbXfGcY+0yDZRVyaZ6Hlx/Qncs869TUcSlEckKDJ9C7XLdHqfY6LteKqkLAveL4lGbUrdPArJ3FW/dNU=
X-Received: by 10.28.108.6 with SMTP id h6mr372366wmc.91.1516667890944; Mon,
22 Jan 2018 16:38:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.173.86 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:38:10 -0800 (PST)
From: Chaofan Li <li3939108@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 18:38:10 -0600
Message-ID: <CANZDnNoGnab6HYESA0oOL-8Q8HtR1Ns0AfP3KNEmwU6KN5W5pA@mail.gmail.com>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e082f7ffce1d055056366c2d7"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,
HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 01:36:14 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Blockchain Voluntary Fork (Split) Proposal
(Chaofan Li)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 00:38:13 -0000
--089e082f7ffce1d055056366c2d7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Miners are most likely to be equally distributed between the two almost
same chains.
If one chain is faster, according to the difficulty adjustment scheme, it
will become more difficult to mine.
The two chain should have similar chain generation rates with similar
difficulty and similar length.
or the miners will be attracted to the chain easier to mine,
and more miners will make the chain generation rate increase and then,
after difficulty adjustment, harder to mine.
Equilibrium will be achieved.
All the above are based on one assumption: the two chains have the same
value initially or miners believe they will have the same value finally.
--089e082f7ffce1d055056366c2d7
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra">Miners are most likely to be=C2=
=A0 equally distributed between the two almost same chains.<br></div><div c=
lass=3D"gmail_extra">If one chain is faster, according to the difficulty ad=
justment scheme, it will become more difficult to mine.</div><div class=3D"=
gmail_extra">The two chain should have similar chain generation rates with =
similar difficulty and similar length.</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">or t=
he miners will be attracted to the chain easier to mine,=C2=A0</div><div cl=
ass=3D"gmail_extra">and more miners will make the chain generation rate inc=
rease and then, after difficulty adjustment, harder to mine.</div><div clas=
s=3D"gmail_extra">Equilibrium will be achieved.</div><div class=3D"gmail_ex=
tra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra">All the above are based on one as=
sumption: the two chains have the same value initially or miners believe th=
ey will=C2=A0 have=C2=A0 the same value finally.</div><div class=3D"gmail_e=
xtra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_ex=
tra"><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br></div></div>
--089e082f7ffce1d055056366c2d7--
|
