1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <pete@petertodd.org>) id 1YqN7C-0002N4-Vl
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 07 May 2015 14:49:30 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org
designates 62.13.149.101 as permitted sender)
client-ip=62.13.149.101; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org;
helo=outmail149101.authsmtp.com;
Received: from outmail149101.authsmtp.com ([62.13.149.101])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1YqN7B-0008O0-VA for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 07 May 2015 14:49:30 +0000
Received: from mail-c237.authsmtp.com (mail-c237.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.237])
by punt15.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t47EnN6J028179;
Thu, 7 May 2015 15:49:23 +0100 (BST)
Received: from savin.petertodd.org (75-119-251-161.dsl.teksavvy.com
[75.119.251.161]) (authenticated bits=128)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t47EnIKL083927
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
Thu, 7 May 2015 15:49:21 +0100 (BST)
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 10:49:18 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Justus Ranvier <justusranvier@riseup.net>
Message-ID: <20150507144918.GA6761@savin.petertodd.org>
References: <554A91BE.6060105@bluematt.me>
<CANEZrP3wGWHdz+ut6pvke5TJJsc1rTFt8sn2KziX35oL5LAsyg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAJHLa0Mr6aQcVRKtidc+qVR7-esriyp5kzAw1LMHHwOcXhhG+Q@mail.gmail.com>
<554B78DE.20600@localhost.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <554B78DE.20600@localhost.local>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Server-Quench: 3f3771ac-f4c8-11e4-9f74-002590a135d3
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aAdMdgUUFVQNAgsB AmMbWlFeVFR7W2I7 bA9PbARUfEhLXhtr
VklWR1pVCwQmRRgG c0BnKWVyfwZPenk+ bUZhWT5YCkd9ckcs
EVMCET4OeGZhPWQC WRZfcx5UcAFPdx8U a1N6AHBDAzANdhES
HhM4ODE3eDlSNilR RRkIIFQOdA4hGjk3 RFg5HCciVWwDTD8+ JgcrQl4B
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1024:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 75.119.251.161/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Headers-End: 1YqN7B-0008O0-VA
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Block Size Increase
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 14:49:31 -0000
--MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 04:38:22PM +0200, Justus Ranvier wrote:
> On 05/07/2015 04:04 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > - This is a major change to the economics of a $3.2B system. This
> > change picks winners and losers. There is attendant moral hazard.
>=20
> This is exactly true.
>=20
> There are a number of projects which aren't Bitcoin that benefit from
> filling in the gap left by Bitcoin's restricted transaction rate
> capability.
>=20
> If Bitcoin fills that gap, Bitcoin wins and those other projects lose.
>=20
> Should decisions about Bitcoin development take into account the
> desires of competing projects?
Well, basically you're asking if we shouldn't assume the people in this
discussion have honest intentions. If you want to go down that path,
keep in mind where it leads.
I think we'll find an basic assumption of civility to be more
productive, until proven otherwise. (e.g. NSA ties)
--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
00000000000000000d49f263bbbb80f264abc7cc930fc9cbc7ba80ac068d9648
--MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQGrBAEBCACVBQJVS3tqXhSAAAAAABUAQGJsb2NraGFzaEBiaXRjb2luLm9yZzAw
MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwZDQ5ZjI2M2JiYmI4MGYyNjRhYmM3Y2M5MzBmYzljYmM3
YmE4MGFjMDY4ZDk2NDgvFIAAAAAAFQARcGthLWFkZHJlc3NAZ251cGcub3JncGV0
ZUBwZXRlcnRvZC5vcmcACgkQJIFAPaXwkfvjkggAg1um0Q8Kd8kRQxZd8wDD2a2N
CenoH6v8g9kNJnhx6Nq0pcyy/KrUNV7lQ19hQgrlkIniUqLkkZ+co8ya5MrRVLVk
HHQj+vje/MxF+sWQPuAUty9LEXv87G+5CAPK2R/BlosvQDgoewmr75EuPIsQv0uU
Q6BRQsVL8voaJdTyiy/0V1n+xePI92yHFEO18bRKaSQoDpaGzCFamkra5IKkVrp6
A5aRJj8qnW8dD+LY1zhpGdonGmfMZvah+12JPwEOuVlrzkdzJGdl5qHcHo1sYBRg
i2U9KXGYcd4xZ9i4dztN3VDjr8r0Baw91/RZ+a+oQYSerUDd61VIy+PPGxbYUQ==
=xN6P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8--
|
