summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/80/07d69369c382ae9fcb6ece6c5522c24e2fdc54
blob: 698a71af0fce9279d1094d574dfa349b93287a9f (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <blaubaer@gmail.com>) id 1QoaM2-0002i5-1P
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 03 Aug 2011 12:15:18 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.161.47 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.161.47; envelope-from=blaubaer@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-fx0-f47.google.com; 
Received: from mail-fx0-f47.google.com ([209.85.161.47])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1QoaLz-0003vH-Mp
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Wed, 03 Aug 2011 12:15:17 +0000
Received: by fxg11 with SMTP id 11so1353506fxg.34
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Wed, 03 Aug 2011 05:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.161.80 with SMTP id q16mr9827282fax.36.1312373709302;
	Wed, 03 Aug 2011 05:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.136] (p4FD0406B.dip.t-dialin.net [79.208.64.107])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w11sm496426faj.14.2011.08.03.05.15.08
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 03 Aug 2011 05:15:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E393BCB.20904@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 14:15:07 +0200
From: Johannes Henninger <blaubaer@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <CANEZrP1-BaNmKhSPXSe2sjH0-DPm62_=OQ_S6aCT3-nLdFLLGA@mail.gmail.com>	<1312371499.2322.14.camel@Desktop666>
	<CANEZrP1k6QQKYUWKOyayWaySMnVrMgpbePX-9HpSq54DvNZCyA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP1k6QQKYUWKOyayWaySMnVrMgpbePX-9HpSq54DvNZCyA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(blaubaer[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
	0.0 T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL To: misformatted and free email service
	0.0 T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT Fill in a short form with personal
	information
X-Headers-End: 1QoaLz-0003vH-Mp
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] DNS seeds returning gone peers
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 12:15:18 -0000

On 08/03/2011 02:00 PM, Mike Hearn wrote:
> Yeah, the limited number of slots doesn't help either. I wonder if the
> current settings are too conservative.
>
> Your seed returns quite a few IPs that don't respond to ICMP pings -
> not sure what is happening there.
Many home routers ignore ICMP requests (mine does) and as far as I know
Windows Vista/7 only responds to pings that originate from a LAN
address/private address range in order to stay more "hidden".