summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/7f/3b4a1be3c2b19f39d5b649e51884ee3ccf7060
blob: d9ecc5fe1aa68ac4e3df26cfcc1b91f7ff97b9f0 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::138])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E47BC002D
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri, 13 Jan 2023 23:47:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8CB821EE
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri, 13 Jan 2023 23:47:06 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 1F8CB821EE
Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key,
 unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com
 header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm3 header.b=L7miuPO/
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id IhOOMron77Xx
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri, 13 Jan 2023 23:47:04 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 2110B821F8
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [64.147.123.19])
 by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2110B821F8
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Fri, 13 Jan 2023 23:47:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45])
 by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AC813200684;
 Fri, 13 Jan 2023 18:47:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163])
 by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 13 Jan 2023 18:47:03 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id
 :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id
 :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to
 :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=
 fm3; t=1673653622; x=1673740022; bh=XEkDDMoVCDh7SLIfpQcJRrfyJdpw
 9Y9QsltY+mGf7M4=; b=L7miuPO/5WdpSuV8NUW5msgXmvjyWiB24wE6hKlsW4Eg
 6SI6beFUlkugALM0YGoOkP0ZtVxJyTJOQ+YiyBtrJ/y1EvEtcCxisTLqHSUiKvix
 Z3RA+r0Q8TaZvT7Zvh+dYbuiJRcGcgmajrTRFqMpSGm55f82LDNF+qOs4M8FHyKV
 +Jg0gdsHotEl2yjtvcfM7SipN8Rzi07mlTgz7aZ5X3Et9QAoLpRLU7LgkBSdgf8n
 95sBw8+2HaCsaphOXIh4YQ3EWTykiiVZZ7om5Qcert49dWUp7+6T8yxq6hNRHhEO
 5iIZ5w70TaUZOIaU1oWA226CxwFIJqjL3Bvzaq5seg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:du3BYyLW_zB85Vn21X858qTZZYVYAFBqz02Tg9HXo28Xv4rzqP6urA>
 <xme:du3BY6LUnuJQv_7NC_ssjFnO7AALLXAHJiyVczYsc2XAIEQRcTKypM84zj6j-DQ0L
 1yH6ZiAhdkj4FK8noA>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:du3BYyttYqndv9Ge-QtIvQQSciqN_sARMOPnMlwQq7fZzfAPxY6wYe1IOYYDhw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrleelgdduhecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf
 curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu
 uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehgtderre
 dttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefrvghtvghrucfvohguugcuoehpvghtvgesphgvthgvrhhtohgu
 ugdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepiedvvdelieekjeeukefgtdelfeegheehle
 ffueehteeghfelveejfeelgeevffefnecuffhomhgrihhnpehpvghtvghrthhouggurdho
 rhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepph
 gvthgvsehpvghtvghrthhouggurdhorhhg
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:du3BY3aJhL93e06SBdkPT6DMRLLuXbJB0qIicZzb_971sre7zxug4Q>
 <xmx:du3BY5ZP-uewx1mR619zKv2P6Jwyf-YLjvUew2d5fYbke7JqbCgX1g>
 <xmx:du3BYzBDQ5xemZzVS1rodddGtBgCt1-9NnBCT9g1DUaminvFa2Draw>
 <xmx:du3BY9He_laJtDgm85YiwhqEnsbLFPySpSQVzVYliQZIruji8FzO3Q>
Feedback-ID: i525146e8:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri,
 13 Jan 2023 18:47:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 7B9045F82C; Fri, 13 Jan 2023 18:46:58 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 18:46:58 -0500
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: alicexbt <alicexbt@protonmail.com>,
 Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <Y8HtctIz35tnOjlm@petertodd.org>
References: <Y7ySzDjzx5eDjOH9@petertodd.org>
 <OwgJwjPrZWRtBaIDDZ8g-xbFPlryUXUopqUuKYVUNE-mVHzCWHFXl77YzDlItEjHTHcGjpzIC5alGsnFEsOtSgHLm9We92gcWrLTahzPGFk=@protonmail.com>
 <Y7035Edqoq8CK+nl@petertodd.org>
 <b3dDOCk8uf5GYtk12iN_EvY9obWchVL-qrNzEJMSf9JqqdcE6uBT8-alz-uK8aNeG_WyUGPLCi1tUxdhjXIPf2uMTbzCaV_5JHUk-FM1wJg=@protonmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NiAf5Rq0/oeD3NjP"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b3dDOCk8uf5GYtk12iN_EvY9obWchVL-qrNzEJMSf9JqqdcE6uBT8-alz-uK8aNeG_WyUGPLCi1tUxdhjXIPf2uMTbzCaV_5JHUk-FM1wJg=@protonmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Full-RBF Makes DoS Attacks on Multiparty
 Protocols Significantly More Expensive
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 23:47:06 -0000


--NiAf5Rq0/oeD3NjP
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 05:10:37PM +0000, alicexbt via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>=20
> > Bringing up Whirlpool here is silly. Everyone knows Samourai has made, =
at best,
> > some rather insane technical decisions. Quite likely downright maliciou=
s with
> > their xpub collection. Their opinion isn't relevant. Cite reputable sou=
rces.
>=20
> I didn't want this thread to become a wasabi vs samourai debate instead w=
anted to focus on full-rbf and how it affects different coinjoin implementa=
tions. Samourai wallet can be used with [dojo][0] that includes full node a=
nd Whirlpool can be used in [sparrow Wallet][1] as well. There are several =
reasons to not use wasabi and consider their opinion irrelevant. Wasabi has=
 many privacy issues including address reuse and consolidation in a coinjoi=
n tx.

Lol, the "address reuse" thing I actually mentioned in my email. Avoiding
address reuse from user errors like loading the same seed into different
wallets isn't realistic, and it has no real impact on other users.

No reasonable person things Samourai's default option of uploading xpubs is
sane. The debate here is over and arguing otherwise is just wasting everyon=
e's
time on this mailing list.

> They completely lost their reputation after deciding to work with chain a=
nalysis firms that help governments for censorship of some UTXOs.

Citation on them working with chain analysis firms? Or did they just roll t=
heir
own blacklist?

Anyway, the blacklisting is just a bit of cowardness. That's not a big deal.
Lots of Bitcoin entitites have done the cowardly thing and implemented
blacklists on the suggestion of their lawyers.  We're probably better off i=
f we
don't set the bar so high that while you're risking jail time implementing
coinjoin, we demand you to take even more risks by not implementing some mo=
stly
symbolic blacklists that affect hardly anyone.

--=20
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org

--NiAf5Rq0/oeD3NjP
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=WuG/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--NiAf5Rq0/oeD3NjP--