1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
|
Return-Path: <tamas@bitsofproof.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76B9A1BB
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 17 Nov 2015 13:26:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 00:16:02 by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de
[80.237.132.66])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C218F171
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 17 Nov 2015 13:26:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [81.0.112.130] (helo=[192.168.0.106]); authenticated
by wp059.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa
(TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
id 1Zyg1a-00032H-GE; Tue, 17 Nov 2015 14:10:18 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Tamas Blummer <tamas@bitsofproof.com>
In-Reply-To: <em58ec03b8-7af4-4643-9414-679acc07fcba@platinum>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 14:10:17 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9F747105-0BE5-48B0-9032-A0B4CBFC8A66@bitsofproof.com>
References: <em58ec03b8-7af4-4643-9414-679acc07fcba@platinum>
To: Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com>,
Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de; tamas@bitsofproof.com; 1447766782;
51c51250;
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 13:53:21 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Dynamic Hierarchical Deterministic Key Trees
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 13:26:23 -0000
Hi Eric,
Would you please enumerate, or point to, arguments that discourage the =
use of a key both for signing and for derivation of a deeper level of =
the hierarchy ?
Tamas Blummer
> On Nov 17, 2015, at 12:40, Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev =
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>=20
> I've submitted a BIP proposal that solves the issue of needing to =
predefine HD wallet structures and not being able to arbitrarily nest =
deeper levels. Comments appreciated.
> =20
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/242
> =20
> =20
> - Eric
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
|
