1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
|
Return-Path: <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D361D8F
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 24 Dec 2018 12:02:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-40133.protonmail.ch (mail-40133.protonmail.ch
[185.70.40.133])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1A487C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 24 Dec 2018 12:02:07 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 12:01:58 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com;
s=default; t=1545652925;
bh=9CB6P0YRKOPH6sya+HnZOXKHNUUZFkVCXybbgMLNJt4=;
h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:
Feedback-ID:From;
b=lB/1fG6WFVa+wmwzaX8dFJJHc3jHzFair3AC+pssL6ZGNU5K40zhudmT6OdEHPhQv
I9mPOOGD8KVVdPiLQqs5aFwBbq4ZkpJrx7KBivrAQI0uuXM6NUh18jB56NOUng1/9X
TgnCT+gYIzbBR6B10fnyJj/05MN3ghd3S42cMF4s=
To: Johnson Lau <jl2012@xbt.hk>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
From: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Reply-To: ZmnSCPxj <ZmnSCPxj@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <_gOQU8sPtEG5jisR7GskWPyvzLK1xixz8-v1YbRWlAXFq9YGPyMEj9Q-xZ6CYfwgiGeJR2Qlboq4UFU_y6pur1HBG_yRTIgngWqiENmJ1Bc=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <F445FD1D-52E2-41E4-8FBD-3419A6317CF6@xbt.hk>
References: <87ftv3xerx.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
<20181214093002.p2nvfrlaycqblww3@erisian.com.au>
<F9FE2267-0BCB-4C67-9AE8-3285B7459D51@xbt.hk>
<87mup4hmq5.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
<2302A26C-FB9C-47D2-AF6C-4D2EF02FFAC0@xbt.hk>
<87y38jn5z8.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
<73F32BC6-751E-4F35-BE6D-B31170FC0A54@xbt.hk>
<20181223042659.munrqfe4l6nff2ug@erisian.com.au>
<F445FD1D-52E2-41E4-8FBD-3419A6317CF6@xbt.hk>
Feedback-ID: el4j0RWPRERue64lIQeq9Y2FP-mdB86tFqjmrJyEPR9VAtMovPEo9tvgA0CrTsSHJeeyPXqnoAu6DN-R04uJUg==:Ext:ProtonMail
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 14:47:55 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Safer sighashes and more granular SIGHASH_NOINPUT
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2018 12:02:08 -0000
Good morning,
> Could anyone propose a better use case of CODESEPARATOR?
Long ago, aj sent an email on Lightning-dev about use of CODESEPARATOR to i=
mpose Scriptless Script even without Schnorr. It involved 3 signatures with=
different CODESEPARATOR places, and forced R reuse so that the signatures =
to claim the funds revealed the privkey.
The script shown had all CODESEPARATOR in a single branch.
I cannot claim to understand the script, and am having difficulty digging t=
hrough the mailinglist
Regards,
ZmnSCPxj
|
