1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
|
Return-Path: <jaredr26@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EF8292B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 1 Apr 2017 18:42:53 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ua0-f182.google.com (mail-ua0-f182.google.com
[209.85.217.182])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C80AF297
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 1 Apr 2017 18:42:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ua0-f182.google.com with SMTP id d64so10556438uad.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 01 Apr 2017 11:42:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=vdnRqLgL/Mwg+BNXLqxU6mcgya4Rl5ixgZQkJQhf12s=;
b=Mc4GyWb8tPM7VtS0nZfuQEkJXFpTjprW4xvBQIEpQsfoTkGiLIj/6w8fzh1Y9AUgn+
bpj9gbZMIfsnmgou0ztnEKjNX91So/hXQBlU1yKufvIvNFS/iOD8+skxGjDzhwCTnl5g
VRtMyL8cKJOKLoOD3HEcemlJz+gdgdmYWs8fkSe+5w3OTd/wE8fTLCStj+BmtK+bBikT
f+ZnQV0xTj0Xbvra84llR+3PwsHcTMhe3V1GK7g4IJOI1ONMtSFBG7K396Tsa3iX0YDh
Vvuj3hksznusYL7GStSX6R+xRdZ+fFlATDu+h9OTOnpGRNl0LxXM8ndrPBV21tZs13m1
LixA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=vdnRqLgL/Mwg+BNXLqxU6mcgya4Rl5ixgZQkJQhf12s=;
b=o9LEDbW56KlYC33US0u/0OPxQFjUumfs1dLAjkR3i1oTqfKYAWqNC1c646OkjBWLB0
QpBcSrRfTH290KAgk1ZbJSVL3R12d/afXQPFSqgpaRZqaJQvjo+A9RTjg6W/fdqQMp0u
DrlzgL6ONCgoXBv0QawUr0eyAzq/BTnl1kcDS31avunXtMnWLcyLj3HUrBSgqEe5aqyg
0GRyVXkmQ2iFsCa013OIUCYClWk2YQ8tkLw7cW15AFRswxBnET4A0l9+qi25iL7zIkSf
rKHC/dO0IX4XyHbhEgrtb6kG9amR9hUpeC0OV9T/kgW2rGnz8i9PCMDuUy+sZGCpvKAZ
Exng==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3EayLiYeKDtlFqhZvbMYl1Zh/fViX7KMPhQ+EAWoZugFNzKGXuU23u/eiD6OwXBlrlt5pFRjLC1R0qUg==
X-Received: by 10.176.4.40 with SMTP id 37mr5009680uav.58.1491072171870; Sat,
01 Apr 2017 11:42:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.157.143 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 11:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.31.157.143 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 11:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAD1TkXusCe-O3CGQkXyRw_m3sXS9grGxMqkMk8dOvFNXeV5zGQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABerxhFY8NoA6sSiz1oZ=01Di8n9+QR1xE6NNtxvm=Ov1bGhWQ@mail.gmail.com>
<9eb001f8-7623-3c79-41bb-7ed6e45b43ae@voskuil.org>
<CAD1TkXtQ8d-yBPtGfzA8E0XMv9vR3Qc0xawpwE6yJgzRH-t5ug@mail.gmail.com>
<2a2b6fc0-f800-2646-55b3-1501cb5d5a30@voskuil.org>
<CAD1TkXusCe-O3CGQkXyRw_m3sXS9grGxMqkMk8dOvFNXeV5zGQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jared Lee Richardson <jaredr26@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2017 11:42:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD1TkXu7EaLP4cYg+2hUBahqk82ZfxEQ62-p9D3DQbJO70vZBQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Voskuil <eric@voskuil.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c06b71623925e054c1f4b2f
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,
HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_OBFUSCATE_10_20, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 18:44:51 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Hard fork proposal from last week's meeting
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 18:42:53 -0000
--94eb2c06b71623925e054c1f4b2f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
That's a quoted general statement that is highly subjective, not a
description of an attack. If you can't articulate a specific attack vector
that we're defending against, such a defense has no value.
On Apr 1, 2017 12:41 AM, "Eric Voskuil" <eric@voskuil.org> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 03/31/2017 11:18 PM, Jared Lee Richardson wrote:
>> If a typical personal computer cannot run a node there is no
>> security.
>
> If you can't describe an attack that is made possible when typical
> personal computers can't run nodes, this kind of logic has no place
> in this discussion.
"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally
controlled networks..."
e
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJY31m0AAoJEDzYwH8LXOFOayIH/0DcWukHZUVTV8952mkWnqjS
RCM8StQOuuTQ/2elvKoZa/nEv1PvpOQEO/AxJDEdIKOqjdXoc/QdZT/Qj834yyFi
mmNLm3x8voO7rTFEVtBrXQ4VYO7Zj5gVy6nRyMrhSGtzg4XqYiyGVoijiumfXOvq
ejLwyWJEf8klBwegIPkX4XX6UYjNyBt+E32Je7NxUbi54EPDRszWpEGGKfJrWiCQ
JO2jqB3O2RbMd0J1onBt2AGsjeQSE3HO0EBQSkdGQZ7PVSdE3I49uT2aAaScnPOt
ymbNz4QtlUWWpUgEI6VSjxHCGjX4+Vrn3HLRwjLe4nS2EX3mOVNY8MHMvbCeAuY=
=tD9k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--94eb2c06b71623925e054c1f4b2f
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"auto"><div>That's a quoted general statement that is highly=
subjective, not a description of an attack.=C2=A0 If you can't articul=
ate a specific attack vector that we're defending against, such a defen=
se has no value.<br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quot=
e">On Apr 1, 2017 12:41 AM, "Eric Voskuil" <<a href=3D"mailto:=
eric@voskuil.org">eric@voskuil.org</a>> wrote:<br type=3D"attribution"><=
blockquote class=3D"quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc =
solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=3D"quoted-text">-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED ME=
SSAGE-----<br>
Hash: SHA256<br>
<br>
</div><div class=3D"quoted-text">On 03/31/2017 11:18 PM, Jared Lee Richards=
on wrote:<br>
>> If a typical personal computer cannot run a node there is no<br>
>> security.<br>
><br>
> If you can't describe an attack that is made possible when typical=
<br>
> personal computers can't run nodes, this kind of logic has no plac=
e<br>
> in this discussion.<br>
<br>
</div>"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally<br=
>
controlled networks..."<br>
<div class=3D"quoted-text"><br>
e<br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)<br>
<br>
</div>iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJY31m0AAoJEDzYwH<wbr>8LXOFOayIH/<wbr>0DcWukHZUVTV8952mk=
WnqjS<br>
RCM8StQOuuTQ/2elvKoZa/<wbr>nEv1PvpOQEO/AxJDEdIKOqjdXoc/<wbr>QdZT/Qj834yyFi<=
br>
mmNLm3x8voO7rTFEVtBrXQ4VYO7Zj5<wbr>gVy6nRyMrhSGtzg4XqYiyGVoijiumf<wbr>XOvq<=
br>
ejLwyWJEf8klBwegIPkX4XX6UYjNyB<wbr>t+<wbr>E32Je7NxUbi54EPDRszWpEGGKfJrWi<wb=
r>CQ<br>
JO2jqB3O2RbMd0J1onBt2AGsjeQSE3<wbr>HO0EBQSkdGQZ7PVSdE3I49uT2aAaSc<wbr>nPOt<=
br>
ymbNz4QtlUWWpUgEI6VSjxHCGjX4+<wbr>Vrn3HLRwjLe4nS2EX3mOVNY8MHMvbC<wbr>eAuY=
=3D<br>
=3DtD9k<br>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>
--94eb2c06b71623925e054c1f4b2f--
|
