1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
|
Return-Path: <keagan.mcclelland@gmail.com>
Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.138])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AFFDC013B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 16 Dec 2020 18:49:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B4285C4C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 16 Dec 2020 18:48:46 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
Received: from whitealder.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 2kl+CTkV8fFS
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 16 Dec 2020 18:48:44 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ej1-f53.google.com (mail-ej1-f53.google.com
[209.85.218.53])
by whitealder.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A622B85BBA
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 16 Dec 2020 18:48:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ej1-f53.google.com with SMTP id x16so34253088ejj.7
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 16 Dec 2020 10:48:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=3GDPOtx7QZGvxVDUH6w0ywfZyQnsA7+DCdnol4t4nLc=;
b=Hi0hY8Z33NnVYBJz7G3n6Nt1SdogEKdJx2WbrAkcdEEMgNforOv1X7UV0QMOjk1Ip1
DASdCWhbtxr/eJQQOp5aMe5Wq8jANVFVM0yBFHoJ875lQ/NkWb3mdD32t4mwIhc+0X4F
WjG1n/Ug2t9X9SliwdrAAvIVg5iMvBXBjj3lSyHxUPF42ApvlG+O9YIIZdBF53E9KirI
3QB2JPgM1Mr6VZLPozWTFOjbb1pqjtUYgCCDCEFKvjPF+hIbnOG3LQ0FxohbRYprE+W7
Vzx9mkA6soyGlYfZ/kS+wieOZHZEbHNYoNjyLDIz3bUvn+AxQq8FoSFQ9+zv9U4G5Hdg
SAgg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=3GDPOtx7QZGvxVDUH6w0ywfZyQnsA7+DCdnol4t4nLc=;
b=fFrhPzxZY6y+x+4AXWKWoRxGdrjbr2YDB9T6BlcUOLIGhQ2m7nwYcjbZ2GH3J8Sm1O
SZoQgb1Uhv7V0EOvypFJY3qF8yONHVe4iBvdk1ecWBE2lZ7uY1V/ze+Q0k/LuAzleqt9
rVoCJXQpuhHlrKwVasljZm9a7RcQKtfBdrk68Go+cWXt8gB2aSN64QfpA0h2LJDBzuWS
jFd6hSnMyV3qf/KUwg0KbAKcE+U1yUQM5cemw9W+EynG1syUb88Vy6uZnAsHHh7O8bt4
7+gVK1Lxetf5FjR13YmjIfa0kbxa9+sgFgv9M1BKyXPr7kR+63mixs4tQ5/1Ls1y7YKV
4m2g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531oRYe7hY5ZqKM/VTjRhZr6wf6TaRqigBzYXa2yNM09zO96/QnB
vA02MXPksFcRdfhzog9H1ln8Avc/WjYcFzDZESk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwatJZYEn8UA7kfbffWFjOc+1NJai73WC574RA16GAANSpFYyfMN+CuNUTokxrLn80QQ5jeEm0da9sh5u6zQ5g=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b2da:: with SMTP id
cf26mr2956105ejb.176.1608144522036;
Wed, 16 Dec 2020 10:48:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cLqW9ZphcaV5hoVNYHjHk_DsdVw_0_hdFxOFwtFkVT9_N_E1IF7ZvtQq745wbqMnny4xzHe8Xdd9TTi2MLyLhB51cI_PJc4fIjLRSpZpGwk=@protonmail.com>
<1_mYgDaVRKZIADl9fWVzTYGNBr0Z43Fp-Gcoz2ibhKY4VKAk1Vbs9XSZ3rlzyGEwvE2YEOn2C0IxAVKkr_rr6KX0YxMiNTiTtQVBL4vgyd8=@protonmail.com>
<202012161716.54878.luke@dashjr.org>
In-Reply-To: <202012161716.54878.luke@dashjr.org>
From: Keagan McClelland <keagan.mcclelland@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 11:48:30 -0700
Message-ID: <CALeFGL0XJhdyfx+dbvFyD1xZUkzfVAAyNyv276Cj+Z5T+OgQSw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fbc7fb05b69952e5"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 19:47:16 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] bip48 proposal
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 18:49:00 -0000
--000000000000fbc7fb05b69952e5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I was just looking into the conventions around this yesterday! It seems
like this proposal is mostly just formalizing stuff that is already a tacit
standard. I'm glad to see that someone is documenting it somewhere more
"official".
It appears consistent with https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/253, Howeve=
r,
due to historical timing, the PR you linked doesn't include any standards
around segwit conventions.
In the review thread you had mentioned that you needed an ACK from prusnak,
but he explicitly gave a NACK in favor of a separate proposal for BIP 48,
which seems like it could be something like the OP. Reading the proposal it
seems consistent with the pull request that you linked, as well. At the end
of the thread the author of PR#253 said they would open a separate
proposal, but it appears that it never materialized. Was there a reason for
this?
Keagan
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 10:17 AM Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> BIP number 48 has not been assigned. Do not self-assign BIP numbers.
>
> Is this intended to be compatible with
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/253 ?
>
> Luke
>
>
>
> On Wednesday 16 December 2020 14:10:28 dentondevelopment via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
> > Here is the repo instead of a static link:
> > https://github.com/Fonta1n3/bips/blob/master/bip-0048.mediawiki
> >
> > Fontaine
> >
> > Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
> >
> > =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Origina=
l Message =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90
> >
> > On Wednesday, December 16, 2020 8:43 PM, dentondevelopment via
> bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I would like to propose bip48 (taking bip44 as inspiration), with the
> > > purpose of documenting modern multi-sig derivations.
> > >
> > > Please see a rough draft of the proposed bip attached, comments/input
> > > welcome.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Fontaine
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
--000000000000fbc7fb05b69952e5
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>I was just looking into the conventions around this y=
esterday! It seems like this proposal is mostly just formalizing stuff that=
is already a tacit standard. I'm glad to see that someone is documenti=
ng it somewhere more "official".</div><div><br></div>It appears c=
onsistent with=C2=A0<a href=3D"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/253" re=
l=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/253=
</a>,=C2=A0However, due to historical timing, the PR you linked doesn't=
include any standards around segwit conventions.<div><br></div><div>In the=
review thread you had mentioned that you needed an ACK from prusnak, but h=
e explicitly gave a NACK in favor of a separate proposal for BIP 48, which =
seems like it could be something like the OP. Reading=C2=A0the proposal it =
seems consistent with the pull request that you linked, as well. At the end=
of the thread the author of PR#253 said they would open a separate proposa=
l, but it appears that it never materialized. Was there a reason for this?<=
/div><div><br></div><div>Keagan</div></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><=
div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 10:17 AM Luke =
Dashjr via bitcoin-dev <<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundat=
ion.org">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blo=
ckquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left=
:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">BIP number 48 has not been as=
signed. Do not self-assign BIP numbers.<br>
<br>
Is this intended to be compatible with <br>
<a href=3D"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/253" rel=3D"noreferrer" tar=
get=3D"_blank">https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/253</a> ?<br>
<br>
Luke<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On Wednesday 16 December 2020 14:10:28 dentondevelopment via bitcoin-dev <b=
r>
wrote:<br>
> Here is the repo instead of a static link:<br>
> <a href=3D"https://github.com/Fonta1n3/bips/blob/master/bip-0048.media=
wiki" rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://github.com/Fonta1n3/bips=
/blob/master/bip-0048.mediawiki</a><br>
><br>
> Fontaine<br>
><br>
> Sent with [ProtonMail](<a href=3D"https://protonmail.com" rel=3D"noref=
errer" target=3D"_blank">https://protonmail.com</a>) Secure Email.<br>
><br>
> =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Origin=
al Message =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90<=
br>
><br>
> On Wednesday, December 16, 2020 8:43 PM, dentondevelopment via bitcoin=
-dev <br>
<<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_bla=
nk">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> > Hello,<br>
> ><br>
> > I would like to propose bip48 (taking bip44 as inspiration), with=
the<br>
> > purpose of documenting modern multi-sig derivations.<br>
> ><br>
> > Please see a rough draft of the proposed bip attached, comments/i=
nput<br>
> > welcome.<br>
> ><br>
> > Regards,<br>
> > Fontaine<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
bitcoin-dev mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blank">=
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev" =
rel=3D"noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mail=
man/listinfo/bitcoin-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
--000000000000fbc7fb05b69952e5--
|
