1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
|
Return-Path: <rgrant@rgrant.org>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::138])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B21EC0001
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 5 Mar 2021 14:51:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31800844DE
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 5 Mar 2021 14:51:41 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.801
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.801 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id qrebcdq50axM
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 5 Mar 2021 14:51:40 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
Received: from mail-wm1-f53.google.com (mail-wm1-f53.google.com
[209.85.128.53])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 275B9844DD
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 5 Mar 2021 14:51:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wm1-f53.google.com with SMTP id i9so1692357wml.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 05 Mar 2021 06:51:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=itU3zeExUwsO0hrWiobHM5ZoKetjdmBPVvnP7Sf1nWE=;
b=b3WL6Onsk0cyHFs3VEtsgIcDmgkQTzbXelhCHGNUOojgCZluii056ByxIGoGQ50koG
eR5ZBkjOM1plNaEzrtuxOhkhT00F0UAlft9BOvGbSbpozPdQKzm1NYSosD4Oo552Ed4O
KsWsyxvnIUpovcC6tqUyPqC6ZEQoHu93pJ5IB9RA7YsqcHm02aOX3YmF5CawYqWL1zye
dmdHKeaodizYQBRigkM5JxTt8oI/GbF4qz7NPSSrIzUfwzCkZq0PbsYW1vOsmUXESLju
UV18btAEUfFX+e+hOz7s3mcopqT0T5HSC7JiEzdwzkz4oBPaiSphDZLO7CYJRfoi+oDA
PjGg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5325+rzZG7YwIoqXPGZjBCg0+K3jApLVH87bsKH4KbxZmo60I4gq
bVoBREgjDVBlTzdplXTxGBUKGpR8HLHLbyUjcwcL+Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyGunxf0PlZhZl/kl3pIGaZEi3PujB6qGaPJeEzpFWJHxDg8tidH2UuJQPQ6jMUm6dhnKM8ezLdaxv4ggOPCt8=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:dc42:: with SMTP id t63mr9256475wmg.153.1614955898295;
Fri, 05 Mar 2021 06:51:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <3286a7eb-9deb-77d6-4527-58e0c5882ae2@riseup.net>
<CAMZUoKkWmdwi-VH3WUvFfG+5MDK3xhvZUac3eBQbxXX_b_btWw@mail.gmail.com>
<4947b02e-90fb-9044-4552-767de805ff14@mattcorallo.com>
<CAMZUoKmTL+2GMpv8Qr5uOUC2bMgyuzMPw1zjdjuD+XNE23-65A@mail.gmail.com>
<CALeFGL2oh5WZi0y64Q0-FjANE8W3GoBrXFNo=9a1OpjcssT30w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALeFGL2oh5WZi0y64Q0-FjANE8W3GoBrXFNo=9a1OpjcssT30w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ryan Grant <bitcoin-dev@rgrant.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 14:51:12 +0000
Message-ID: <CAMnpzfrTkP=9JXHg2+1Xz03q34w-YoB_Nff5trw9OyqOSqB_0A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Keagan McClelland <keagan.mcclelland@gmail.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Making the case for flag day activation of taproot
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 14:51:41 -0000
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 7:32 PM Keagan McClelland via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> So that leads me to believe here that the folks who oppose LOT=true
> primarily have an issue with forced signaling, which personally I
> don't care about as much, not the idea of committing to a UASF from
> the get go.
The biggest disconnect is between two goals: modern soft-fork
activation's "Don't (needlessly) lose hashpower to un-upgraded
miners"; and UASF's must-signal strategy to prevent inaction.
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2020-January/017547.html
This question dives to the heart of Bitcoin's far-out future.
Of two important principles, which principle is more important:
- to allow everyone (even miners) to operate on the contract they
accepted when entering the system; or
- to protect against protocol sclerosis for the project as a whole?
Do miners have a higher obligation to evaluate upgrades than economic
nodes implementing cold storage and infrequent spends? If they do,
then so far it has been implicit. LOT=true would make that obligation
explicit.
|
