1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
|
Return-Path: <xor@freenetproject.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B1CFEA1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 21 Jan 2016 02:25:58 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from smtprelay06.ispgateway.de (smtprelay06.ispgateway.de
[80.67.31.103])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A41DD11D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 21 Jan 2016 02:25:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [88.68.27.94] (helo=anonymous)
by smtprelay06.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa
(TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84)
(envelope-from <xor@freenetproject.org>) id 1aM4w8-00064A-Mb
for bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org;
Thu, 21 Jan 2016 03:25:24 +0100
From: xor@freenetproject.org
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Reply-To: xor@freenetproject.org
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 03:25:50 +0100
Message-ID: <2998879.R5sQRbxZRv@1337h4x0r>
Organization: Freenet Project
User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.13.0-74-generic; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <87si1rycux.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
References: <87si1rycux.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart50123742.ysuN96afWM";
micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Df-Sender: eG9yQGZyZWVtYWlsLmJvZ2VydC5kZQ==
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 03:23:55 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Three Month bitcoin-dev Moderation Review
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 02:25:58 -0000
--nextPart50123742.ysuN96afWM
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
On Thursday, January 21, 2016 11:20:46 AM Rusty Russell via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> So, what should moderation look like from now on?
The original mail which announced moderation contains this rule:
> - Generally discouraged: [...], +1s, [...]
I assume "+1s" means statements such as "I agree with doing X".
Any sane procedure of deciding something includes asking the involved people
whether they're for or against it.
If there are dozens of proposals on how to solve a particular technical
problem, how else do you want to decide it than having a vote?
It's very strange that this is not allowed - especially if we consider that
the Bitcoin community is in a state of constant dissent currently.
The effect is likely that you push the actual decision-making to IRC, which
less people have access to (since it's difficult to bear the high traffic),
and thus form some kind of "inner circle" - which makes decisions seem even
more as if they're being dictated.
So please consider allowing people to say whether they agree with something
something or don't.
Other than that, thanks for the good latency of moderation, I guess you're
doing hard work there :)
--nextPart50123742.ysuN96afWM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)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=74BM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart50123742.ysuN96afWM--
|
