1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>) id 1X7jPY-0003vA-I7
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 17 Jul 2014 10:59:40 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.217.174 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.217.174; envelope-from=melvincarvalho@gmail.com;
helo=mail-lb0-f174.google.com;
Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com ([209.85.217.174])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1X7jPX-0007sC-Aa
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Thu, 17 Jul 2014 10:59:40 +0000
Received: by mail-lb0-f174.google.com with SMTP id c11so1593021lbj.33
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Thu, 17 Jul 2014 03:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.8.109 with SMTP id q13mr31376597laa.31.1405594772701;
Thu, 17 Jul 2014 03:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.112.106 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 03:59:32 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 12:59:32 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKaEYhJwOPGq44+PfENKSPV8JV2bODqNtNHCqXcnJjE2e28GOQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c36472200b4f04fe6189e2
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(melvincarvalho[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1X7jPX-0007sC-Aa
Subject: [Bitcoin-development] Mining Hashrate Caps
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 10:59:40 -0000
--001a11c36472200b4f04fe6189e2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I noticed this article today.
GHash Commits to 40% Hashrate Cap at Bitcoin Mining Summit
http://www.coindesk.com/ghash-commits-40-hashrate-cap-bitcoin-mining-summit=
/
Here's a quote from Satoshi when the mining arms race began:
"We should have a gentleman=E2=80=99s agreement to postpone the GPU arms ra=
ce as
long as we can for the good of the network. It=E2=80=99s much easer to get =
new
users up to speed if they don=E2=80=99t have to worry about GPU drivers and
compatibility. It=E2=80=99s nice how anyone with just a CPU can compete fai=
rly
equally right now."
Maybe outdated now, but I thought it was interesting.
--001a11c36472200b4f04fe6189e2
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div><div><div><div>I noticed this article today.=C2=
=A0 <br><br>GHash Commits to 40% Hashrate Cap at Bitcoin Mining Summit<br><=
br><a href=3D"http://www.coindesk.com/ghash-commits-40-hashrate-cap-bitcoin=
-mining-summit/">http://www.coindesk.com/ghash-commits-40-hashrate-cap-bitc=
oin-mining-summit/</a><br>
</div><br></div>Here's a quote from Satoshi when the mining arms race b=
egan:<br><br>"We should have a gentleman=E2=80=99s agreement to postpo=
ne the GPU arms race as long as we can for the good of the network. It=E2=
=80=99s much easer to get new users up to speed if they don=E2=80=99t have =
to worry about GPU drivers and compatibility. It=E2=80=99s nice how anyone =
with just a CPU can compete fairly equally right now."<br>
<br></div>Maybe outdated now, but I thought it was interesting.</div></div>=
</div>
--001a11c36472200b4f04fe6189e2--
|
