1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <pete@petertodd.org>) id 1UPcoW-0004Hk-Ej
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 09 Apr 2013 17:58:36 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org
designates 62.13.148.108 as permitted sender)
client-ip=62.13.148.108; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org;
helo=outmail148108.authsmtp.net;
Received: from outmail148108.authsmtp.net ([62.13.148.108])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1UPcoU-0002dG-HN for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Tue, 09 Apr 2013 17:58:36 +0000
Received: from mail-c226.authsmtp.com (mail-c226.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.226])
by punt5.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Kp) with ESMTP id
r39HwOHa049229; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 18:58:24 +0100 (BST)
Received: from savin (76-10-178-109.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.178.109])
(authenticated bits=128)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id r39HwJs0044602
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
Tue, 9 Apr 2013 18:58:22 +0100 (BST)
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 13:58:19 -0400
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
Message-ID: <20130409175819.GA31229@savin>
References: <CA+8xBpc5iV=prakWKkNFa0O+tgyhoHxJ9Xwz6ubhPRUBf_95KA@mail.gmail.com>
<CANEZrP1EKaHbpdC6X=9mvyJHC_cvW7u5p9nqM7EwkEypAg4Xmg@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+8xBpdBDDxD46f9ugn-ueZGwMU6fnF4BheUGiiz1otOTdffEw@mail.gmail.com>
<CANEZrP2B4CGwGp1BsPScyC_+DndLDMnHTzWhmhfUxQnE3bVuSA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="envbJBWh7q8WU6mo"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANEZrP2B4CGwGp1BsPScyC_+DndLDMnHTzWhmhfUxQnE3bVuSA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Server-Quench: 11ded91a-a13f-11e2-98a9-0025907ec6c5
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aQdMdgsUGUUGAgsB AmUbWlxeVVV7W2E7 bAxPbAVDY01GQQRq
WVdMSlVNFUsqAhV5 QWRdUhl2cwNGejB4 bU5iEHFaCBEufEcs
Xx9VFjsbZGY1an0W WBFRagNUcgZDfhgQ OVYsUT1vNG8XDQg5
AwQ0PjZ0MThBJSBS WgQAK04nCWENWzE7 RhYNVTkmAURNXD06 KnQA
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1020:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 76.10.178.109/587
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
X-Headers-End: 1UPcoU-0002dG-HN
Cc: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] On-going data spam
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 17:58:36 -0000
--envbJBWh7q8WU6mo
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 04:53:47PM +0200, Mike Hearn wrote:
> there's an obvious backwards compatibility problem there. It should
> probably wait until the payment protocol work is done, so the major user =
of
> micropayments-as-messages can migrate off them.
As I pointed out in my initial post on the issue, SatoshiDice is pretty
much unaffected by the patch. They just have to deduct enough from
incoming bets to make the "you lost" output economical and they're good
to go. IIRC they already deduct fees on low-value bets anyway.
On the other hand, the patch makes a clear statement that Bitcoin is not
for microtransactions. If succesful it will gradually force a number of
users, ad-based faucet sites and the like, to off-chain transactions or
off Bitcoin entirely. The payment protocol has nothing to do with that.
--=20
'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
--envbJBWh7q8WU6mo
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlFkVrsACgkQpEFN739thoyUkACeN/J6YesIctiP8IyZt0OSl7k4
6IkAn0/x8JpyvEuVij2TQSC1vPg3DaEg
=0MEJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--envbJBWh7q8WU6mo--
|
