1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9131BC8
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 27 Jun 2015 15:14:20 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail149084.authsmtp.net (outmail149084.authsmtp.net
[62.13.149.84])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14131118
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 27 Jun 2015 15:14:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235])
by punt18.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t5RFECf4086936;
Sat, 27 Jun 2015 16:14:12 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [33.91.28.142] (mf62d36d0.tmodns.net [208.54.45.246])
(authenticated bits=0)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t5RFEAh6094052
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Sat, 27 Jun 2015 16:14:11 +0100 (BST)
In-Reply-To: <CACq0ZD5S6dDcBh9fsHCgbPJXom4vF8VymtHXogODjfD38RDNfA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPg+sBjOj9eXiDG0F6G54SVKkStF_1HRu2wzGqtFF5X_NAWy4w@mail.gmail.com>
<CADm_Wca+ow4pMzN7SyKjsMdFo0wuUerYYjf5xKs5G_2Q2PzMmA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPg+sBg=sn7djO_8H16NDg7S7m7_0eTcrgLVofMWQ2ANz+jw9w@mail.gmail.com>
<CADm_WcbQog_UCV=JPHyqTRxKbaGY7jedtHE_D8jJSe_thMg05w@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPg+sBhrBUSfPdMjbLthLEFD17zBC3LoWf9LvZsOD1Vp0D78BQ@mail.gmail.com>
<558DA56F.3010703@jrn.me.uk> <20150626193630.GB17829@muck>
<558E3EFD.9040602@ktorn.com>
<CACq0ZD5S6dDcBh9fsHCgbPJXom4vF8VymtHXogODjfD38RDNfA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=UTF-8
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 15:13:54 +0000
To: Aaron Voisine <voisine@gmail.com>, Filipe Farinha <filipe@ktorn.com>
Message-ID: <9BD77EB3-8EC7-4207-8E90-98E48C8365DE@petertodd.org>
X-Server-Quench: 2a8cc7ee-1cdf-11e5-b396-002590a15da7
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aQdMdAUUEkAaAgsB AmMbWlJeUVl7WGE7 aQpZcwBZfE5LQQdu
VldNRFdNFUssBH53 c29GVBl7cwVDejB4 Y0BmEHIKVBcpchMo
X08HQTsbZGY1bX1N U0leagNUcgZDfk5E bwQuUz1vNG8XDSg5
AwQ0PjZ0MThBHWxp QgxFK18fTQ4FGSR0 QxkYEjg1VUcBQC4w NHQA
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1023:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 208.54.45.246/465
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] The need for larger blocks
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 15:14:20 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 27 June 2015 03:14:41 GMT-04:00, Aaron Voisine <voisine@gmail.com> wrote:
>Also remember that the sender is not the one who cares about delays or
>even
>getting confirmations at all, it's the receiver who's concerned with
>these
>things. They have to tell the sender up-front what they're willing to
>accept in exchange for goods and services.
You're assuming a receiver who is accepting a zeroconf transaction; most receivers don't.
For instance, when I deposit funds on my exchange they don't credit those funds until 4 confirmations, so I very much cafe about how long it takes to get the first confirmation.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQE9BAEBCAAnIBxQZXRlciBUb2RkIDxwZXRlQHBldGVydG9kZC5vcmc+BQJVjr2g
AAoJEMCF8hzn9Lnc47AIAJBa5O+H+XEqok4j8AEly9rjAMmdcOrqJSoNvtCj897l
R34cN/5SfYIRpvFoyBKXfY+xo0RR/42VM08uju+vvCAvImiwOyrUNPTS2TmDdE3M
PTGgQrYIctQxTcek9VL8TV94bHns+kJxMiOySdsOA+7NLl0oKoNKoHhYbbWPcn/+
13p+su2Xi/ydO6HjHHxR/3kpQE4q8tupGDH0ZaPUijyd04uvB4GK4pPA5P7EeM9b
ixXB8aZnSYhbVnknUFfcTBLHzo70BQbTh0QFTZCOkNSwIoBfyEhd53IZ+BfJGbLo
2K2VcMHeVU91Zbg+rgKNfGuLQvr5hEfZIkqZckXDj6I=
=B/YW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
