1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
|
Return-Path: <buzztiaan@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60B1ABE8
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:53:43 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pd0-f174.google.com (mail-pd0-f174.google.com
[209.85.192.174])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D8AB1F0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:53:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pdbqm3 with SMTP id qm3so27196201pdb.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 15 Jul 2015 08:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
bh=/XItxjzy8U9lzERFWp5iGDrf5s2wX7YmsjNfD/i56EQ=;
b=MfD64U0mkYe2Vf6ZD04zx4haSvDPEwDxbIt1TgJOZwdcZ1kArzkcj0Rtqb7UQk6F9u
lKoSGkFoAWq2g6ajOErWHjLW15RGuFh0yWOz3lFzRNOmQZsQ+QMm+0rjRgluLqQUi7wo
2kSm7ZmUwnauvIK00MJMdEcNEiaK42gCUgVtZsfu5ZiA0JkiiQA5abAW9koWnyshhI4w
Y0LnZ7SS6W4FtoVa2InMGr3QkOjIDpZb5AwkOVsiVIiAVKJ4qulUgT+Q37Qx7yyA7vw9
+G4lrfMa8m4HuuskHMRoC/OISwArlKUTC1gMnr7pOHiplqNNyl8PG+cDLikIcwg/Bgay
3MgQ==
X-Received: by 10.66.186.138 with SMTP id fk10mr9253114pac.75.1436975622372;
Wed, 15 Jul 2015 08:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: buzz@spacedout.nl
Sender: buzztiaan@gmail.com
Received: by 10.66.84.166 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 08:53:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CDB5FC27-F3F0-44F7-BBC6-670ACAE740D2@gmail.com>
References: <24662b038abc45da7f3990e12a649b8a@airmail.cc>
<55A66FA9.4010506@thinlink.com>
<20150715151825.GB20029@savin.petertodd.org>
<CDB5FC27-F3F0-44F7-BBC6-670ACAE740D2@gmail.com>
From: Bastiaan van den Berg <buzz@spacedout.nl>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:53:22 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4IPjaAndhlUuEsOt6sGtKGdA1kk
Message-ID: <CACLj26Ks3bwPbqQDkh4HMXXbwUq4pFLvzRpqnuL5=6ZyOZb8jw@mail.gmail.com>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bf0f40885c6a1051aebf5a9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham
version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Significant losses by double-spending unconfirmed
transactions
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:53:43 -0000
--047d7bf0f40885c6a1051aebf5a9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Me via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> > Blockcypher's "confidence factor" model(1)
> > under the hood - yet another one of those sybil attacking network
> > monitoring things
>
>
> Peter, I noticed on your twitter you have a lot of bad things to say about
> Blockcypher and their business model (which I might not full agree, but
> totally respect), can you share any evidence they perform any form of Sybil
> attack on the network, please.
? He says it -monitors- for such a attack, usually monitoring does not
include causing it ;)
--
buZz
--047d7bf0f40885c6a1051aebf5a9
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
te">On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Me via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr">&=
lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_blan=
k">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>></span> wrote:<blockquote c=
lass=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;=
padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D"">
> Blockcypher's "confidence factor" model(1)<br>
> under the hood - yet another one of those sybil attacking network<br>
> monitoring things<br>
<br>
<br>
</span>Peter, I noticed on your twitter you have a lot of bad things to say=
about Blockcypher and their business model (which I might not full agree, =
but totally respect), can you share any evidence they perform any form of S=
ybil attack on the network, please.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>? He sa=
ys it -monitors- for such a attack, usually monitoring does not include cau=
sing it ;)</div><div><br></div><div>--</div><div>buZz=C2=A0</div></div></di=
v></div>
--047d7bf0f40885c6a1051aebf5a9--
|
