1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
|
Return-Path: <pete@petertodd.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EAE9892
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:33:09 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from outmail149101.authsmtp.com (outmail149101.authsmtp.com
[62.13.149.101])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1AFEE
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:33:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235])
by punt15.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t7L9X6o5091216;
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 10:33:06 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [25.160.234.125] ([24.114.37.247]) (authenticated bits=0)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t7L9Wvi7044210
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Fri, 21 Aug 2015 10:33:02 +0100 (BST)
In-Reply-To: <CADJgMzsPkGTtTuTd0AFCeGz9u1A8+fx4+TMS34O-mNsExBkfRA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+1nnrk1EWd7rhwj91p1rqgGVFgOT4UYq=+Nmq41sHJYmy7YYA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAAS2fgR4bsJtC99-fK1L+FsQT7vOfOpz9FOVqvAnqbpkaRJHLQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+1nnr=35TPycf3=0xn0gbkx=KfEZ36uY3nWEdK986n=dftSHA@mail.gmail.com>
<CADJgMzsPkGTtTuTd0AFCeGz9u1A8+fx4+TMS34O-mNsExBkfRA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=UTF-8
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:32:52 +0000
To: Btc Drak <btcdrak@gmail.com>,
Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
Nicolas Dorier <nicolas.dorier@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <0853B7C1-F032-4B64-BB71-5E6E93C9835D@petertodd.org>
X-Server-Quench: a0571510-47e7-11e5-b398-002590a15da7
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
bgdMdAMUGUATAgsB AmMbWlReU157WWY7 aQ5PbARZfElJQQdu
V1dNRFdNFUssBmAI YVhHVRl2cwdHeDB3 Yk5qECFbWUN7cEd9
X0pTQGobZGY1bX1N U0lQagNUcgZDfk5E bwQuUz1vNG8XDSg5
AwQ0PjZ0MThBHWx+ RRsAZX4fX11DTHY3 ThZKDDIyVVYFTj8+
Zw0hN0RUAEYWL0oy LUBpUFgfLgNaAwla V2tsODQRIF9JWyoq
FktFUEQFESFQCXA0
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1023:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 24.114.37.247/465
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Core Devs : can you share your thoughts about all
BIPs on this website ?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:33:09 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 21 August 2015 02:09:06 GMT-07:00, Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>The site could be extended to include major stakeholders too like
>major service providers (think exchanges, wallet providers etc) and
>mining pools.
Given the strong consensus that blockchains simply don't scale well - even Andersen describes a blocksize increase as "kicking then can down the road" - it'd be good to ask service providers what their long term plans for growth are.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQE9BAEBCgAnIBxQZXRlciBUb2RkIDxwZXRlQHBldGVydG9kZC5vcmc+BQJV1vA2
AAoJEMCF8hzn9Lncz4MH/23E4erqX1qZnXDb++hoVSXrEhj38ERVQFrMxBQ4Vpd+
VwdrYdNYLdMTdiQRYIFq1TWMQrQh18p2N6QnIo/hAskzRcWOBkc2/WyTCME6keY5
xYcruJELjmoD80zwkQRIOpfLV8483vST3aoInZ/TIYPqvgNW6Jd1ymPxSyoZD6le
hm/yQHe0gCO4hfow4Exx35YVPiNOB4RaJf6W9WRC7d5otpMz/ZVyFtYNgjBBCVRD
DSXSbISYxi7XI6E4muyDAaDylU/cVrZpJT8Tfal9bjnoZbtm44TzMDVuV7XI9/zs
yQ3ClTDY3FRTPogIskC2wbC5la2wzHogVO25FGSjKZQ=
=icqv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|