summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/6d/a112f129e1159046a9d2349106a9c57622b913
blob: b6b5f69f43ae22db83843e4a326eee5027f225a8 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <mh.in.england@gmail.com>) id 1Sf8bR-0003Wk-4d
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:52:41 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 74.125.82.53 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=74.125.82.53; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-wg0-f53.google.com; 
Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Sf8bL-0003fX-Ob
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:52:41 +0000
Received: by wgbfm10 with SMTP id fm10so1494472wgb.10
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Thu, 14 Jun 2012 04:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.180.8.69 with SMTP id p5mr46113715wia.17.1339674749591; Thu,
	14 Jun 2012 04:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com
Received: by 10.216.254.232 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 04:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+8xBpecVQcTTbPxUm_3_GWC99dEd4=-VFWb+QT6jUy4rg8U4w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+8xBpecVQcTTbPxUm_3_GWC99dEd4=-VFWb+QT6jUy4rg8U4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:52:29 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: nzEI0TPjOU1Krm2FfLAjUU5mXuE
Message-ID: <CANEZrP0kNZDByHpK2=UjP+ag0X1KmqHxnJdm=e_pWMitP4QvvA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(mh.in.england[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1Sf8bL-0003fX-Ob
Cc: Bitcoin Development <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] New P2P commands for diagnostics,
	SPV clients
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:52:41 -0000

> filterinit(false positive rate, number of elements): initialize
> filterload(data): input a serialized bloom filter table metadata and data.

Why not combine these two?

> 'filterload' and 'filteradd' enable special behavior changes for
> 'mempool' and existing P2P commands, whereby only transactions
> matching the bloom filter will be announced to the connection, and
> only matching transactions will be sent inside serialized blocks.

Need to specify the format of how these arrive. It means that when a
new block is found instead of inv<->getdata<->block we'd see something
like  inv<->getdata<->merkleblock where a "merkleblock" structure is a
header + list of transactions + list of merkle branches linking them
to the root. I think CMerkleTx already knows how to serialize this,
but it redundantly includes the block hash which would not be
necessary for a merkleblock message.