1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <allen.piscitello@gmail.com>) id 1YHOGz-0007vW-UU
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 31 Jan 2015 02:59:01 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.212.181 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.212.181;
envelope-from=allen.piscitello@gmail.com;
helo=mail-wi0-f181.google.com;
Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1YHOGw-0007SD-1u
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 31 Jan 2015 02:59:01 +0000
Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id fb4so5931651wid.2
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Fri, 30 Jan 2015 18:58:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.181.8.199 with SMTP id dm7mr458798wid.81.1422673132040; Fri,
30 Jan 2015 18:58:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.48.105 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 18:58:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CADZB0_aWkSApjRA-WQcVsonOTpZNX8=G=iuY3k+dKSwDq=xM6A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADZB0_aWkSApjRA-WQcVsonOTpZNX8=G=iuY3k+dKSwDq=xM6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 20:58:51 -0600
Message-ID: <CAJfRnm5H7gn6xmMFdikNFSy-geWrpW4dQDw8NsFqz_3YxH=ESg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Allen Piscitello <allen.piscitello@gmail.com>
To: Angel Leon <gubatron@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134cd60aab83d050de9e6f4
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(allen.piscitello[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1YHOGw-0007SD-1u
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Is there a way to estimate the maximum
number of transactions per minute Bitcoin can handle as it is today?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 02:59:02 -0000
--001a1134cd60aab83d050de9e6f4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
You are assuming that the only way to use Bitcoin is on-chain transactions
and that is the only way for it to scale. This is a mistake.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Angel Leon <gubatron@gmail.com> wrote:
> On the Chinese "Single's Day" (sort of like the american Black Friday)
> according to MIT's Tech Review
> <http://www.technologyreview.com/news/534001/alipay-leads-a-digital-finance-revolution-in-china/>
> magazine
>
> "Alipay handled up to 2.85 million transactions per minute, and 54 percent
> of its transactions are made via mobile device."
>
> For a few weeks I've been reading the conversations about block sizes and
> the experiments being done on the subject with larger blocks.
>
> On the day with the most transactions, the Bitcoin block chain averages
> about 73 transactions per minute. I kept wondering what blocksize we'd need
> for handling 100,000 transactions per minute, and estimated that roughly
> we'd need a blocksize of about 1300x times larger than what we have now, so
> bigger than 1Gb block... but seeing the numbers Alipay gets to handle just
> in China make me wonder how scalable is Bitcoin if it were to truly compete
> with worldwide financial services.
>
> If you were to include double the number Alipay can handle, you'd be
> shooting about 6 million transactions per minute, or roughly 60 million
> transactions per block.
>
> If you average every transaction around 250 bytes, then you'd need ~15
> Gigabytes per block to be broadcast and hashed by all the full nodes every
> 10 minutes, eating good 2Tb of storage daily... do miners have enough
> bandwidth and CPU power to handle this?
>
> are my scalability concerns absurd?
>
> http://twitter.com/gubatron
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
> sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is
> your
> hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
> leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
> look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>
--001a1134cd60aab83d050de9e6f4
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr">You are assuming that the only way to use Bitcoin is on-ch=
ain transactions and that is the only way for it to scale.=C2=A0 This is a =
mistake.</div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On =
Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Angel Leon <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"m=
ailto:gubatron@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">gubatron@gmail.com</a>></spa=
n> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;b=
order-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div>On the Ch=
inese "Single's Day" (sort of like the american Black Friday)=
according to <a href=3D"http://www.technologyreview.com/news/534001/alipay=
-leads-a-digital-finance-revolution-in-china/" target=3D"_blank">MIT's =
Tech Review</a> magazine</div><div><br></div><div><span style=3D"color:rgb(=
0,0,0);font-family:NHG,'Helvetica Neue',Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;=
font-size:14px;line-height:20px">"Alipay handled up to 2.85 million tr=
ansactions per minute, and 54 percent of its transactions are made via mobi=
le device."</span><br></div><br>For a few weeks I've been reading =
the conversations about block sizes and the experiments being done on the s=
ubject with larger blocks.<br><br>On the day with the most transactions, th=
e Bitcoin block chain averages about 73 transactions per minute. I kept won=
dering what blocksize we'd need for handling 100,000 transactions per m=
inute, and estimated that roughly we'd need a blocksize of about 1300x =
times larger than what we have now, so bigger than 1Gb block... but seeing =
the numbers Alipay gets to handle just in China make me wonder how scalable=
is Bitcoin if it were to truly compete with worldwide financial services.<=
br><br>If you were to include double the number Alipay can handle, you'=
d be shooting about 6 million transactions per minute, or roughly 60 millio=
n transactions per block.<br><br>If you average every transaction around 25=
0 bytes, then you'd need ~15 Gigabytes per block to be broadcast and ha=
shed by all the full nodes every 10 minutes, eating good 2Tb of storage dai=
ly... do miners have enough bandwidth and CPU power to handle this?=C2=A0<b=
r><br>are my scalability concerns absurd?<br><br clear=3D"all"><div><div><a=
href=3D"http://twitter.com/gubatron" target=3D"_blank">http://twitter.com/=
gubatron</a><br></div></div>
</div>
<br>-----------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------<br>
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,<br>
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is you=
r<br>
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought<br>
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a<=
br>
look and join the conversation now. <a href=3D"http://goparallel.sourceforg=
e.net/" target=3D"_blank">http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/</a><br>_______=
________________________________________<br>
Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-develo=
pment@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
--001a1134cd60aab83d050de9e6f4--
|
