1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
|
Return-Path: <da2ce7@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D3519B
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 17 Aug 2015 00:03:42 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pd0-f176.google.com (mail-pd0-f176.google.com
[209.85.192.176])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27CD91FC
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 17 Aug 2015 00:03:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pdbfa8 with SMTP id fa8so49175803pdb.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sun, 16 Aug 2015 17:03:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
:in-reply-to:content-type;
bh=gHuteVrpxiZEhC8QwtzSQpZ14k4vOFYJLIEu2z1zzak=;
b=OhY0+jcqYzJbqNAXPh+4ci5n/ss3mxYkzSHZhpevLJGdSKp4/6S9fzTW87Z5H9x7+d
lvXVW6+36E4r+/ZA+gZ6OUb4otMbcTdk57cwq8JjPn2dT1e2Ar5RXAq6HrrKC06M8Lsk
WqI0WjFGXnf2Ryv9uGNMTs9IVtsst4T6bMXD3eiewJuZULw8Vd8jL3gaMKcJ71fg4pYB
g3Rv0ePjycxrgAZOT+2H26ngMAYqOxOfbbgQ7pxhyEbV2WJ5cTiwFtJTGI5XLY07/5FV
xS8KqlpcYlG3GdjRqPgj+Qg7JLAX0Fyefo2RqJ6VT7IEKikdidUWkz58uCikqmxD8TfW
sP1w==
X-Received: by 10.70.132.74 with SMTP id os10mr35594786pdb.87.1439769821895;
Sun, 16 Aug 2015 17:03:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.126] ([168.70.69.242])
by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id
qp13sm12463139pbb.9.2015.08.16.17.03.39
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Sun, 16 Aug 2015 17:03:40 -0700 (PDT)
To: Andrew LeCody <andrewlecody@gmail.com>,
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
References: <CADWuND3EfO6YO3g4H09_mWhrHC4PX4SZpTTuETiX2PyCxSRCsQ@mail.gmail.com>
<55D1167B.1060107@gmail.com>
<CAEX2NSfaPv0g07hfT31voGWX05Z6uaBsZOjhMkOwBr4mdHbPQw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Cameron Garnham <da2ce7@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <55D124D7.4050209@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 08:03:35 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAEX2NSfaPv0g07hfT31voGWX05Z6uaBsZOjhMkOwBr4mdHbPQw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="MJLRNg1aAk9TbNmcCEB7Ttbhe9124jNlO"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin XT 0.11A
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 00:03:42 -0000
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--MJLRNg1aAk9TbNmcCEB7Ttbhe9124jNlO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Since it was a game theory analysis. I will not address your other commen=
ts.
On 17/8/2015 7:22 AM, Andrew LeCody wrote:
>> 4. Setup a fork of Bitcoin XT that allows people to easily make a
> transaction only on the XT fork (while leaving the original BTC coins
> untouched).
>=20
> I doubt this is even possible.
Trivial.
There are a few ways: here is my favorite (for the moment).
1. Spam the 8mb blocks with 1 Satoshi outputs to the brainwallet 'Bitcoin=
XT'
2. Let these spam tx be in BitcoinXT, however not Bitcoin (easily done).
3. Let the forked XT client includes a unspent dust output with any
transaction. Let the this client create 100 dust outputs for other
people to use in the same transaction.
This transaction will only be possible to confirm with Bitcoin XT. -
Leaving your Bitcoin coins untouched.
I particularly like this approach, as it is ironic as the spam is more
cheaply done with larger blocks.
Cam.
A quick political note:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstentionism
Hard forks are not something that is a democratic process. Thus
frustrating a false-democratic process is completely legitimate.
--MJLRNg1aAk9TbNmcCEB7Ttbhe9124jNlO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iF4EAREIAAYFAlXRJNwACgkQBJ8cMDO159bJBAD9FtQhX3QaMHdWt0YnbV3+zKwI
3CZcw3ysajhY3Bsyb8oA/itLkUt9kH06FTuQ4uTN2qQEeX/mFGEeN+saA7L92FLZ
=8en1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--MJLRNg1aAk9TbNmcCEB7Ttbhe9124jNlO--
|
