summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/6a/7cb76e862bdb5ff37f640a3b6b78649923a58c
blob: 14908f64765aa0e92480c8107f91a44689e630ce (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
Return-Path: <kanzure@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAE344D3
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat, 15 Aug 2015 20:47:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-io0-f181.google.com (mail-io0-f181.google.com
	[209.85.223.181])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 639E31C6
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat, 15 Aug 2015 20:47:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by iodv127 with SMTP id v127so100010775iod.3
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Sat, 15 Aug 2015 13:47:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=BBcK5wdG8owAQhNpOc7B8Pdszsy6abpaHfI0RcLSSC4=;
	b=ffnB2Wm/felAeSb526E0f+4iDhrDqS0qKPA/j8r1rdebPupQMDUBAEXCeCQQZ9AgpB
	7ej5dPpDRkH7ilNBVYpqCH/JSdd3CQocQxE2ogYLq15ifLa9mAsfp6mNgTXGLTd4qYJa
	Xdm0Uxx3tfWLfiYVWwgoGRyNUlBeBb7k7dVbqSarZi3u8NzqMKgQ+RcBcaXVgSg0jhZV
	LYp6MZRXikMTdTxo5SnBCvqsTcgGRH9GVvXItJ+onzrVTj1ovS8mAaBnKht9i+jcnJqd
	qJxaDDFOuxRReTVe/BmLFCKPPwtjy30dLiZi3Zbe5DBlQN4FNrwEN5hHy1qSylBPcV3v
	Iygw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.7.168 with SMTP id g40mr11212932ioi.28.1439671625908;
	Sat, 15 Aug 2015 13:47:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.91.135 with HTTP; Sat, 15 Aug 2015 13:47:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55CFA2E0.9040301@bitcoins.info>
References: <CA+w+GKT7t5OahS-+P=QAmOyFzPnOs4J6KSo+mhSrC0YggmMupg@mail.gmail.com>
	<55CF871E.9050500@sky-ip.org>
	<CA+w+GKTG6a_v4Jop3FZ2O2WG9Fi=o0Lnh58OH4Y4sM-vPjFHSQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<55CFA2E0.9040301@bitcoins.info>
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2015 15:47:05 -0500
Message-ID: <CABaSBayeKp4-N9UwwXQrDNuENxD8M8UGxWTLYtMChOkUeUi_jw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>
To: Milly Bitcoin <milly@bitcoins.info>, Bryan Bishop <kanzure@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f2784db09cb051d5fab0b
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin XT 0.11A
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2015 20:47:06 -0000

--001a113f2784db09cb051d5fab0b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Milly Bitcoin via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> These are the people who used to run around saying that Bitcoin
> development is "decentralized" because anyone can fork the code and now
> many of the same people claim a fork will destroy everything.


You may be misremembering; nobody has ever disagreed that you can fork a
source code repository. Perhaps you are thinking instead about the concerns
regarding "asymmetric" rule incompatibilities?

- Bryan
http://heybryan.org/
1 512 203 0507

--001a113f2784db09cb051d5fab0b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On S=
at, Aug 15, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Milly Bitcoin via bitcoin-dev <span dir=3D"ltr=
">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" target=3D"_b=
lank">bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><block=
quote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc=
 solid;padding-left:1ex">These are the people who used to run around saying=
 that Bitcoin development is &quot;decentralized&quot; because anyone can f=
ork the code and now many of the same people claim a fork will destroy ever=
ything.</blockquote></div><br>You may be misremembering; nobody has ever di=
sagreed that you can fork a source code repository. Perhaps you are thinkin=
g instead about the concerns regarding &quot;asymmetric&quot; rule incompat=
ibilities?<br clear=3D"all"><div><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_signature">-=
 Bryan<br><a href=3D"http://heybryan.org/" target=3D"_blank">http://heybrya=
n.org/</a><br>1 512 203 0507</div>
</div></div>

--001a113f2784db09cb051d5fab0b--