summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/68/73bf186a5a1a20d97d8cfe41fc2c975ce449a3
blob: 7fa91289dfbe09e832230483bd4756c58ef59c2e (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
Return-Path: <dan@osc.co.cr>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E54C049B
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 20 Dec 2017 06:59:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 00:08:13 by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail.osc.co.cr (unknown [168.235.79.83])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A22EFE0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 20 Dec 2017 06:59:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.27] (unknown [182.18.252.38])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: danda)
	by mail.osc.co.cr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07D761F033;
	Tue, 19 Dec 2017 22:50:46 -0800 (PST)
To: Nicolas Dorier <nicolas.dorier@gmail.com>,
	Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
References: <CA+1nnr=-6UkJT=TWjDHhZtXsic8p0fzQ=Yk1tSqkhL+NuvqCQw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dan Libby <dan@osc.co.cr>
Message-ID: <bbc5e5fc-7273-9799-2b41-e12c9c7d0030@osc.co.cr>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 14:50:42 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/52.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+1nnr=-6UkJT=TWjDHhZtXsic8p0fzQ=Yk1tSqkhL+NuvqCQw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE
	autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 15:16:52 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Crypto Open Exchange Protocol (COX)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 06:59:07 -0000

currencyCode and cryptoCurrencyCode seem to assume that merchants will
always want to sell for fiat.  But a merchant might want to sell for
another cryptocurrency instead.

Why not make it more generic, like buySymbol and sellSymbol?

>         "currencyCode" : "CAD",
>         "cryptoCurrencyCode" : "BTC",