1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
|
Return-Path: <adam.back@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8E4BB08
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 7 Sep 2017 01:29:56 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-qt0-f176.google.com (mail-qt0-f176.google.com
[209.85.216.176])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 610C846D
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 7 Sep 2017 01:29:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qt0-f176.google.com with SMTP id q8so19919344qtb.5
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 06 Sep 2017 18:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=mhPXG9q8CUHrD8eTF/Oshg6JyICOxdalniXO6CSoW+g=;
b=QGnLsss7sNMtN1oqC2cpuVtik/fqSwvyHSpy5CB/g4Sx4bNzIvSMnfIWsFBQhdxi0k
ZO25n2SLYx4HWqQkkIgHXkG85lIilNCiN2At5S6yeum8k663NcPmoHuqdJvIk6uOSMf7
XHs7POZxjfyzfEeTM7I5QP+w370Dxpwp7HUpdjLrcQNIezK7lOcPs8YIubDGePnKWggR
W9UJgTemWyJQmOmjMy/kDdmtwTz4N3STNFf3BNj84BKm47iYmPUxpJL3bbNVYHKx6cvW
MVMlOWjiclB9NSdmccDc2tRZeJVYJLy0+HNjhj/M3Lg0pAhgA9X0eInttLMMMetiK633
87UQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references
:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=mhPXG9q8CUHrD8eTF/Oshg6JyICOxdalniXO6CSoW+g=;
b=gxbVsQ+cgbRW2BX8ut5F+ZH81gXXQDsj7XAZuAjZLFK3pXrdr1q+lEYn83jgbXl/Tj
3plw3nLmmBhZ3eWoy3RqUmMT7+7XBq48T7sTbHJ0lZK9FgdSiSGC0nXG/HLksEOPmM4d
5cgrKYeREZ2UM2d0A5n52k6ZBsZakA2pwmiO3MqicNLLWDev3A5aKGhrDetbMA3d1Srh
Ht1VxCJHtiZmAmUDkRppIN1l37wQcAPIuqzn4UvIAV+s5IwQaLGA0JYpZR5PNNaqvAJV
jzWRRskvMNWfXvdk/cCaymoCHWytYbrqgUPARxlwM4LdEhnOKvwKxfW7dU6TeG0w29rt
9QIQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUgxEDAx8HIKtOoTggMW0Xd5XIzulLN7kD+cBeup2Tpsxgjez1Jd
gkblmCiBkXYr4HtKzD0C5PdSEjkVOA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb7eUr8ZDRqzMD7+XVpK545v2ViKukwzUhgLjZtWeZ3b6do/pK62seBTwx3v/ZchwuoGIpGxd3zUmpgWhduMJjo=
X-Received: by 10.200.54.136 with SMTP id a8mr1268513qtc.307.1504747795498;
Wed, 06 Sep 2017 18:29:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.132.100 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 18:29:55 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: adam@cypherspace.org
In-Reply-To: <CAF5CFkh4DWE6Ca-5LFrgkGxWgYqqJdEdv+JZ+3wp+0eTm_vqCw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABm2gDojDQWMhw8wW1UkRGKtdbby2+6AFFZLPuRcUb7WF_u5qQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAF5CFkh4DWE6Ca-5LFrgkGxWgYqqJdEdv+JZ+3wp+0eTm_vqCw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Back <adam.back@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 02:29:55 +0100
Message-ID: <CALqxMTHxdLqms_OgT71EtS2kY2=_8yfNsatNNnOjfSHrLnQL-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: CryptAxe <cryptaxe@gmail.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM
autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] SF proposal: prohibit unspendable outputs with
amount=0
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 01:29:56 -0000
The pattern used by Felix Weiss' BIP for Confidential Transactions
depends on or is tidier with 0-value outputs.
Adam
On 7 September 2017 at 00:54, CryptAxe via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> As long as an unspendable outputs (OP_RETURN outputs for example) with
> amount=3D0 are still allowed I don't see it being an issue for anything.
>
> On Sep 5, 2017 2:52 PM, "Jorge Tim=C3=B3n via bitcoin-dev"
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> This is not a priority, not very important either.
>> Right now it is possible to create 0-value outputs that are spendable
>> and thus stay in the utxo (potentially forever). Requiring at least 1
>> satoshi per output doesn't really do much against a spam attack to the
>> utxo, but I think it would be slightly better than the current
>> situation.
>>
>> Is there any reason or use case to keep allowing spendable outputs
>> with null amounts in them?
>>
>> If not, I'm happy to create a BIP with its code, this should be simple.
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
|
