1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
|
Return-Path: <earonesty@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68994C002A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 9 May 2023 00:04:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA2F61135
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 9 May 2023 00:04:34 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 3CA2F61135
Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=q32-com.20221208.gappssmtp.com
header.i=@q32-com.20221208.gappssmtp.com header.a=rsa-sha256
header.s=20221208 header.b=rPR/6e3e
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id VjrfEM1p7EaJ
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 9 May 2023 00:04:33 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 0852A61132
Received: from mail-yb1-xb30.google.com (mail-yb1-xb30.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b30])
by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0852A61132
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 9 May 2023 00:04:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb30.google.com with SMTP id
3f1490d57ef6-ba21644874cso471624276.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 08 May 2023 17:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=q32-com.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1683590672; x=1686182672;
h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=Y3u1lhNWEKc1HBJFwOMfRvPU5uXDVoWNCq3bTm9RTTI=;
b=rPR/6e3ewrMOWDnS4N/hC25IzhPvdI5C3nPYKEuNlbpfEB5n7dX2GY1bJnoutf7E3i
3jnWrJKrmu8uzbHbwfTeoO0y2OyTzIezTD4QhHiPQbW/eNmtPetohyy5kA67t3QGIi6Z
VvkZeyAUCls+mX+AI9r6Yqm+7BddbNJO4g7nrP08+LK+nQwSx7f90AnoglvcVtCGFUcE
bDkngsHUa/2yjx8seiwqOp6HG/lFc5GEebacMUMP0DIlwCNHZohCXX7Y23Hmcjk5d9b4
3BUYWrJ2FD41pW/OfWCEGHkKAK/3USl2xtIFpZOwy7JbmB3Jq8wB8Xhit0hRYRX4nDuT
FAYw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1683590672; x=1686182672;
h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
:reply-to;
bh=Y3u1lhNWEKc1HBJFwOMfRvPU5uXDVoWNCq3bTm9RTTI=;
b=KFMCaHKUdgmbQ5snEarhnWmgxLOTuMThCRPrdmlgGfn9CfQmoQfvOqWD3xCCNEbo/y
pdmo+s/5O/UokU0Ss+c6IQ+dF1an+Zd0OKlWoq26o5x1QVM8PIwKpoAuEZILK4V4bYg6
xQ3GW4GygCf0CawtnxdV8V1IfeKXqGx61yIz9/vblboVqEpJWOO+GL0QoEDjoBnOr2HB
i4lh5WLPZwSLhfjyd6eiHDiHitzaNXHPQVa0RrINOUtb8Lewex7nQyKAHeyXiZQZISit
HQUirJEprrqV37smu0CXTOOogsTvs+TND3NNR61BoXYXQQNH4kS4xMsY7gNgC6+TJFjy
7OAg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDytDqc0fs9bXs5q3F3rrDjqZot2KD+msU+rgf86S3zGcRcSPwek
wakoDubzyM2ds5+wFN53njtRkH5B2KaI+Fj4kUEjFwfN2aOK
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ7oYGt/WgG3KuLODDFvFmIN+dUalwe/0+9vulOr4klZB54ABvgMyXT3I6QuKnvqGcHuOSxsEk+lHtDMbkwZuZw=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:264a:0:b0:b9e:84b0:a7b9 with SMTP id
m71-20020a25264a000000b00b9e84b0a7b9mr12071944ybm.0.1683590671692; Mon, 08
May 2023 17:04:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAJowKg+1WwH_ub9JA=RhnFqvC14RuK4_f4WmJC2P_FYAa78q-Q@mail.gmail.com>
<ZFmMh6A7wtjgd1Xj@petertodd.org>
In-Reply-To: <ZFmMh6A7wtjgd1Xj@petertodd.org>
From: Erik Aronesty <erik@q32.com>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 20:04:19 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJowKg+vkzhVWRP8FbtJiPBZ_yC0ZrfGA2+GpPTS8jQ3mOq+Bg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000eef92405fb377f23"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 09 May 2023 01:59:03 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] tx max fee
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2023 00:04:34 -0000
--000000000000eef92405fb377f23
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
fair. i suppose you could support cpfp in any dust filtering. im not a
fan, but I think its the only legit way to defend the chain from non money
use cases
On Mon, May 8, 2023, 7:58 PM Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org> wrote:
> On Sun, May 07, 2023 at 07:59:40PM -0400, Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
> > possible to change tx "max fee" to output amounts?
> >
> > seems like the only use case that would support such a tx is spam/dos
> type
> > stuff that satoshi warned about
> >
> > its not a fix for everything, but it seems could help a bit with certain
> > attacks
>
> With CPFP it often makes sense for a transaction to have a fee larger than
> the
> output amounts.
>
> This proposal would also screw over applications like my OpenTimestamps
> service.
>
> --
> https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
>
--000000000000eef92405fb377f23
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"auto">fair.=C2=A0 =C2=A0i suppose you could support cpfp in any=
dust filtering.=C2=A0 =C2=A0im not a fan, but I think its the only legit w=
ay to defend the chain from non money use cases</div><br><div class=3D"gmai=
l_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Mon, May 8, 2023, 7:58 PM=
Peter Todd <<a href=3D"mailto:pete@petertodd.org">pete@petertodd.org</a=
>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0=
0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On Sun, May 07, 2023 a=
t 07:59:40PM -0400, Erik Aronesty via bitcoin-dev wrote:<br>
> possible to change tx "max fee"=C2=A0 to output amounts?<br>
> <br>
> seems like the only use case that would support such a tx is spam/dos =
type<br>
> stuff that satoshi warned about<br>
> <br>
> its not a fix for everything, but it seems could help a bit with certa=
in<br>
> attacks<br>
<br>
With CPFP it often makes sense for a transaction to have a fee larger than =
the<br>
output amounts.<br>
<br>
This proposal would also screw over applications like my OpenTimestamps<br>
service.<br>
<br>
-- <br>
<a href=3D"https://petertodd.org" rel=3D"noreferrer noreferrer" target=3D"_=
blank">https://petertodd.org</a> 'peter'[:-1]@<a href=3D"http://pet=
ertodd.org" rel=3D"noreferrer noreferrer" target=3D"_blank">petertodd.org</=
a><br>
</blockquote></div>
--000000000000eef92405fb377f23--
|
