1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
|
Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <gmaxwell@gmail.com>)
id 1V43lF-0001qM-QL; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 06:50:21 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.215.52 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.215.52; envelope-from=gmaxwell@gmail.com;
helo=mail-la0-f52.google.com;
Received: from mail-la0-f52.google.com ([209.85.215.52])
by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1V43lD-0005PI-RW; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 06:50:21 +0000
Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id fq13so3822148lab.25
for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 23:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.74.47 with SMTP id q15mr27358273lbv.75.1375167012944;
Mon, 29 Jul 2013 23:50:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.160.104 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 23:50:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAEvNM8=yQn8sE4Lrf5+xedfm4RomBkBVhVWOdFFXxPEk7wZYDw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEvNM8=yQn8sE4Lrf5+xedfm4RomBkBVhVWOdFFXxPEk7wZYDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 23:50:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAS2fgS=5ju1BFFDkjoRW65qdtojm3rYBHZcSMtUmHhyaTxMhA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net,
bitcoin-list@lists.sourceforge.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(gmaxwell[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
author's domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1V43lD-0005PI-RW
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BitMail - p2p Email 0.1. beta
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 06:50:22 -0000
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Randolph D. <rdohm321@gmail.com> wrote:
> Secure P2P Email from Friend to Friend without relying on a central server.
> Key- / Repleo-Exchange.
> Full decentral Email-Network using the Echo Protocol.
> Store Email for Offline-Friends in the P2P Network.
> Chat and Instant Messaging is build in. Define & Add your friends.
> Strong e2e Multi-Encryption (PGP-kind/AES over SSL: using libgcrypt).
> Libspoton Integration.
> Additional Security Layer with the GB-Feature for Emails.
> Preventing Data Retention (VDS). WoT-less.
> HTTP & HTTPS Connections.
> Open Source. BSD License.
>
> anyone with a Server? Key?
Keep safe everyone:
A number of apparent sock accounts has been posting about what appears
to be the same software under the name "goldbug" for a couple days
now:
e.g.
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2013-July/029107.html
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2013-July/029125.html
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2013-July/047137.html
|