1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
|
Return-Path: <tony991@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E2EE412
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:50:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com (mail-wm0-f67.google.com [74.125.82.67])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F4E08C
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:50:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wm0-f67.google.com with SMTP id i138so7851534wmf.3
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:50:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=A8eW2ldLfCoNEX46Tg7hTCelnmsqPHh1rkf7YbD0oWE=;
b=sIBgLd9VjaNWVWUzJROkf8euWYjcXzkwsOBTTKq3fSTJP2EjSFDB/owAj8eXiPAJrG
lAXag0B2ODS8g4k6WJN0mCSq0kkbO4MiE1fZfcgVZHmZ04fBN/XY2XKsgfG0s/7fHwTf
4rHRMlHZiuCyeGxIItKdpL2A2subiuEHWKPaZ7l5Dn/fNKbNadfCM0izbID8PhMiKJHR
sCMf4CTTsDD1chlsBFFgp0OguO09taftVwm8RT7UAKYupUNQp2hEIcx3ya9EpWMLvULN
5FgoXg3cTAn2A2Q+n+9iJHr1N/4k3ZKPitizHxnAEvptEy8HzOx9ijwtMzGaZuurTRNV
biNA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=A8eW2ldLfCoNEX46Tg7hTCelnmsqPHh1rkf7YbD0oWE=;
b=jFcxz8aPTiuP37HHMOt2idYt2E4W+acoRwfnu+GpfEqRbdQS9uvQuPYmLrfo9T2zi1
GlmSIyC1QIRIbNYu3imxKfjZYX4w+DL/nSXsFHD4vaLe/axDJ2d6A5LYuXleeJ9hfvr2
zfj5+CCyElimfA7IKEyuw1fAbsZZWR5d2NKmr1UTxsKM6pUcISKXm+Vwk0T8zLMgVZnF
UCOoZffv0gSkA45hOoDYrqYMp6OJHBaxk7nwJshmlyUKtbOIF20jP/mK4swR5KUa12LL
c765ykZ72WklWIOsuy1wclxVOl5jLqEDvfo7vFopYrTmbuGmil0xwzSXf2x7OxyYkYg/
xuoQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutFs/q1wSbqIl2W/1pX96/6goUl5fK57ulgo37GAZ1gLvHWXiPuL2CS9gQr9C9BMdLeCm5HBIlbLBMAHA==
X-Received: by 10.194.127.163 with SMTP id nh3mr2502814wjb.74.1470815426562;
Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:50:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.100.161 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:50:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAL3p6zpvv7ph9CJQF6E1VVdwCKKFLNe2EVh=JE=R0Gpt4y=1Tw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL3p6zpADtYFQnQUr3Efk6V59+K+bB3tPQQMGT9weiafU=43zA@mail.gmail.com>
<20160808154707.GB2196@banane.informatik.uni-ulm.de>
<CAL3p6zo1xBEu90MDHSK4TNX0DL2QXxq5vC48a2cFnX0JCD=RvQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAH+Axy6yJ3WotKjsMjo3o23V5Du1nniu8Bzd3gxYX5OuqeB6gw@mail.gmail.com>
<20160808215354.GA1373@fedora-21-dvm>
<CAL3p6zpvv7ph9CJQF6E1VVdwCKKFLNe2EVh=JE=R0Gpt4y=1Tw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tony Churyumoff <tony991@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:50:25 +0300
Message-ID: <CAL3p6zoMK=3Rv5VmR5auOt3CpnLaFQ-N2Gz4NBCBLqgmQr+mOA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 14:53:25 +0000
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Fwd: Hiding entire content of on-chain transactions
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 07:50:29 -0000
> The OP's proposal sounds quite similar to my earlier one along similar lines:
>
> https://petertodd.org/2016/closed-seal-sets-and-truth-lists-for-privacy
Similar indeed, thank you for the link.
2016-08-09 0:53 GMT+03:00 Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>:
>
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 09:41:27PM +0000, James MacWhyte via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > Wouldn't you lose the ability to assume transactions in the blockchain are
> > verified as valid, since miners can't see the details of what is being
> > spent and how? I feel like this ability is bitcoin's greatest asset, and by
> > removing it you're creating an altcoin different enough to not be connected
> > to/supported by the main bitcoin project.
>
> The fact that miners verify transactions is just an optimisation:
>
> https://petertodd.org/2013/disentangling-crypto-coin-mining
>
> Preventing double-spending however is a fundemental requirement of Bitcoin, and
> this proposal does prevent double-spending perfectly well (although there may
> be better ways to do it).
>
> The OP's proposal sounds quite similar to my earlier one along similar lines:
>
> https://petertodd.org/2016/closed-seal-sets-and-truth-lists-for-privacy
>
> --
> https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
|
