1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
|
Return-Path: <elombrozo@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86BE1407
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:44:24 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pa0-f41.google.com (mail-pa0-f41.google.com
[209.85.220.41])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EBD58F
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:44:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pacan13 with SMTP id an13so79400036pac.1
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 28 Jul 2015 17:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
:message-id:references:to;
bh=6Ir4j1WDc2PhN5WrzypiqU2/j0CK2HmzIFvueAy8R3c=;
b=HLAMZTJJi38Po21T3EGZOHYnl4/ecBrtKfAGJHijk7mVvP9GBorRvyd6m3Ssu73nNF
noBBShqFVm70mPW9dHeJQPSspwzcYBMOi2J/1SxQBe7n4tgLAmap6t1W7QAAqzkdwFDP
P381/jlz0KKlUZIFcvXsD5dwCUYR3rffogvCoBCfEgLjN78Xe3OZdwNWqgBZSaHFNYyc
/uTV9UpA3K7yIwuD3mN0QOOumjx3DVN8M2f95hB2KdVMp1qJy/WBOhk86SpyWUDyi/Ox
cGlTPGtgRsYpF+ZFhLHlxc572RMW+R925ydfXvEjzZbbU9H+GxY3Ua/T+Jma96FOPvsm
g3Tg==
X-Received: by 10.66.142.73 with SMTP id ru9mr87180264pab.78.1438130663877;
Tue, 28 Jul 2015 17:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.107] (cpe-76-167-237-202.san.res.rr.com.
[76.167.237.202]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
o7sm37293558pdi.16.2015.07.28.17.44.21
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Tue, 28 Jul 2015 17:44:22 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_D6116086-AFDB-438B-A2D6-D4C317B918BB";
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5
From: Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <D2CDA490-F04A-41EA-85F7-56BA5B052729@me.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 17:44:20 -0700
Message-Id: <7E427946-E19B-4214-8324-0AB2F78EE7BE@gmail.com>
References: <1B7F00D3-41AE-44BF-818D-EC4EF279DC11@gmail.com>
<D2CDA490-F04A-41EA-85F7-56BA5B052729@me.com>
To: Jean-Paul Kogelman <jeanpaulkogelman@me.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Why Satoshi's temporary anti-spam measure isn't
temporary
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:44:24 -0000
--Apple-Mail=_D6116086-AFDB-438B-A2D6-D4C317B918BB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
> On Jul 28, 2015, at 5:43 PM, Jean-Paul Kogelman =
<jeanpaulkogelman@me.com> wrote:
>=20
>=20
>> Enter a =E2=80=9Ctemporary=E2=80=9D anti-spam measure - a one =
megabyte block size limit. Let=E2=80=99s test this out, then increase it =
once we see how things work. So far so good=E2=80=A6
>>=20
>=20
> The block size limit was put in place as an anti-DoS measure (monster =
blocks), not "anti-spam". It was never intended to have any economic =
effect, not on spam and not on any future fee market.
>=20
>=20
> jp
>=20
I=E2=80=99m using spam and DoS somewhat synonymously here, although =
you=E2=80=99re correct - DoS is a more accurate term.
--Apple-Mail=_D6116086-AFDB-438B-A2D6-D4C317B918BB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org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=z/qn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Apple-Mail=_D6116086-AFDB-438B-A2D6-D4C317B918BB--
|
