1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
|
Return-Path: <aj@erisian.com.au>
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::138])
by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78592C0032
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 27 Oct 2023 18:32:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DEFC84E04
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 27 Oct 2023 18:32:25 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 4DEFC84E04
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 7QHCiWxCImgW
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 27 Oct 2023 18:32:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from cerulean.erisian.com.au (azure.erisian.com.au [172.104.61.193])
by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1677684E01
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Fri, 27 Oct 2023 18:32:22 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 1677684E01
Received: from aj@azure.erisian.com.au
by cerulean.erisian.com.au with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2)
(envelope-from <aj@erisian.com.au>)
id 1qwRd4-000478-0t; Sat, 28 Oct 2023 04:32:19 +1000
Received: by email (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 28 Oct 2023 04:32:13 +1000
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2023 04:32:13 +1000
From: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
To: Ethan Heilman <eth3rs@gmail.com>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <ZTwCLcjmuU4vkxTL@erisian.com.au>
References: <CAEM=y+XDB7GGa5BTAWrQHqTqQHBE2VRyd7VWjEb+zCOMzRP+Lg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAEM=y+XDB7GGa5BTAWrQHqTqQHBE2VRyd7VWjEb+zCOMzRP+Lg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_bar: /
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed BIP for OP_CAT
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 18:32:25 -0000
On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 01:08:03AM -0400, Ethan Heilman via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> We've posted a draft BIP to propose enabling OP_CAT as Tapscript opcode.
> https://github.com/EthanHeilman/op_cat_draft/blob/main/cat.mediawiki
If you're interested in making this available via inquisition, here's
a set of 3 patches that should allow it to be messed with on regtest:
https://github.com/ajtowns/bitcoin/commits/202310-inq25-cat
Tests need updating and adding, however.
You might wish to compare with similar commits from the APO/CTV PRs at
https://github.com/bitcoin-inquisition/bitcoin/pull/33
https://github.com/bitcoin-inquisition/bitcoin/pull/34
It may be worth adding support for CSFS as well, if experimenting with
that is desirable, rather than having them as separate script-verify
flags and deployments.
> [1]: R. Pike and B. Kernighan, "Program design in the UNIX
> environment", 1983,
> https://harmful.cat-v.org/cat-v/unix_prog_design.pdf
"harmful cat", you say?
Cheers,
aj
|
