1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
|
Return-Path: <teekhan42@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62859A67
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 4 Feb 2017 22:02:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ua0-f174.google.com (mail-ua0-f174.google.com
[209.85.217.174])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAC5A79
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 4 Feb 2017 22:02:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ua0-f174.google.com with SMTP id i68so37799634uad.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Sat, 04 Feb 2017 14:02:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=SDyUB+D82SSh1DEksg5peeKI1e3enxtbtVmHN8gmIoI=;
b=WXxEsdeF3MrJ8hxjDFnFTvcrXfJYxQ3PqsKMtUR0KhZrtpnYSuaCnuBsgG/wvgYAEt
pBW73fv/4+fAviiz+Qr9ymh4yLxLc23NrsHOtFfNwKGqSiPfu7wJwX018wonxwFgAYyk
r764By8m14zt69F6qGNCpRnXqFbW/PcftCNcB0fo+1GGMMUhSVduKt9AVNjKDnEA7Fk1
gdImgNC2cpmZ5dPdIIExzRPFxJex6pRYEdZONYYbBQUtIrblJREsNiNAMG/VYcYTcZCE
G9tseD98Znne8mWrkfyJ+B7Ie6MI7q43MbL3TqAcsDemBTHlfC67jDx9X82/a7kvvs4s
lx9g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=SDyUB+D82SSh1DEksg5peeKI1e3enxtbtVmHN8gmIoI=;
b=luCrc8kD74f3ZOO3Ex5IcyJZB0HIv9YGGWM1NAGAhhR4nu/IkQUMhXLKU3vG4jCi4B
DkZ0zyz6neknGVO3Z4luKcdjzQL1vOORmdKlDwG+AHrM/p9YHx4Nrvi7k+RxHU1h6ExN
dqTMH+VrAzlui9MUy1ZMnWk+9mA7QpFOi9vlIxTOE9qxSS1j1hsm2TYwrWX6mhH1IM/q
QEZxG8e0jGdtSBFc2JTtg0vq7C98vsTE1UgwOPhn/Z25Vu7JlDCAcgq4gf/SF8xBqh58
Vw2JST3Mdr0eSHFMvKhh1uvlM9iTCOaaQhrZ5+Gu02m3+Qk2+5pg8Lg3oRkkDM9P/vYS
j7CQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nGVNUhQBtnYaJYhXTLvxc8OesALPU6Kf56mwgdzeBQm9GNODTa5mS+EkqB9vzFnqnbOJjI0apLQziYhA==
X-Received: by 10.176.18.238 with SMTP id o46mr1746674uac.71.1486245720985;
Sat, 04 Feb 2017 14:02:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.49.77 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 14:02:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <201702030024.10232.luke@dashjr.org>
References: <CAGCNRJqNg9-aYG62OxTz5RJyx+JJkx-kt2odooZWs92f5teZiw@mail.gmail.com>
<201702030024.10232.luke@dashjr.org>
From: "t. khan" <teekhan42@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 17:02:00 -0500
Message-ID: <CAGCNRJp6vpqqaf8=8CwPP6iXB6UULWh8Kezw2i-2GfLn3b1bxg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f403043614623f987c0547bb8ccc
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,
HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 05 Feb 2017 15:32:56 +0000
Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [Pre-BIP] Community Consensus Voting System
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2017 22:02:02 -0000
--f403043614623f987c0547bb8ccc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
> Strongly disagree with buying "votes", or portraying open standards as a
> voting process. Also, this depends on address reuse, so it's fundamentally
> flawed in design.
>
The point of this is it's available right now. It's not ideal, but it will
work. It doesn't require any code and we can do it today.
In case you haven't been paying attention; there's already enough support
for Unlimited to prevent SegWit from ever being adopted. Without
significant community outreach (which is the purpose of the CCVS) and a
compelling solution to max block size, Core as a product is dead.
Also, you need to be pretty paranoid to believe that address reuse is an
issue in this situation.
Note also that the BIP process already has BIP Comments for leaving textual
> opinions on the BIP unrelated to stake. See BIP 2 for details on that.
>
This does nothing for the community in general. Plus there's no way to
measure that sort of feedback.
- t.k.
--f403043614623f987c0547bb8ccc
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">=
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Luke Dashjr <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=
=3D"mailto:luke@dashjr.org" target=3D"_blank">luke@dashjr.org</a>></span=
> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;bo=
rder-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Strongly disagree with buying &q=
uot;votes", or portraying open standards as a<br>
voting process. Also, this depends on address reuse, so it's fundamenta=
lly<br>
flawed in design.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>The point of this is =
it's available right now. It's not ideal, but it will work. It does=
n't require any code and we can do it today.</div><div><br></div><div>I=
n case you haven't been paying attention; there's already enough su=
pport for Unlimited to prevent SegWit from ever being adopted. Without sign=
ificant community outreach (which is the purpose of the CCVS) and a compell=
ing solution to max block size, Core as a product is dead.</div><div><br></=
div><div>Also, you need to be pretty paranoid to believe that address reuse=
is an issue in this situation.</div><div><br></div><blockquote class=3D"gm=
ail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-le=
ft:1ex">Note also that the BIP process already has BIP Comments for leaving=
textual<br>
opinions on the BIP unrelated to stake. See BIP 2 for details on that.<br><=
/blockquote><div><br></div><div>This does nothing for the community in gene=
ral. Plus there's no way to measure that sort of feedback.</div><div><b=
r></div><div>- t.k.</div><div>=C2=A0</div></div></div></div>
--f403043614623f987c0547bb8ccc--
|
