blob: cf6f7f3b8adab2507c9e5662f92076634e952c6b (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
|
Return-Path: <luke@dashjr.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8225D950
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 12 Nov 2015 20:26:14 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from zinan.dashjr.org (zinan.dashjr.org [192.3.11.21])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6C01D4
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 12 Nov 2015 20:26:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown
[IPv6:2001:470:5:265:61b6:56a6:b03d:28d6])
(Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D0A938A6EA4;
Thu, 12 Nov 2015 20:25:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Hashcash: 1:25:151112:1240902@gmail.com::XTOBycK5ygvnaL1z:ONXT
X-Hashcash: 1:25:151112:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org::ef+amqgUNYgaRma5:eGIKG
X-Hashcash: 1:25:151112:lf-lists@mattcorallo.com::=A41MZVEI=pBfeP3:5Ty2
From: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
To: Chun Wang <1240902@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 20:25:23 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.1.9-gentoo-r1; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; )
References: <5644ECE6.9090304@mattcorallo.com>
<201511122012.29966.luke@dashjr.org>
<CAFzgq-xZA7VApQJv-b9n12H+GmL7u4Qv_481UsHWNqXGn6NubA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFzgq-xZA7VApQJv-b9n12H+GmL7u4Qv_481UsHWNqXGn6NubA@mail.gmail.com>
X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F
X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F
X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201511122025.24518.luke@dashjr.org>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Upcoming Transaction Priority Changes
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 20:26:14 -0000
On Thursday, November 12, 2015 8:20:45 PM Chun Wang wrote:
> The sort by priority part in the block is always the best place for spam
> nowadays.
What are you saying here? Spammers generally can't use the priority space at
all, and it is a major way for legitimate users to get their transactions
mined cheaply despite ongoing spam attempts. You're suggesting the exact
opposite is true?? Please explain.
Luke
|
