1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
|
Return-Path: <hearn@vinumeris.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18FBB409
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 20 Jul 2015 14:42:07 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-ie0-f170.google.com (mail-ie0-f170.google.com
[209.85.223.170])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9202DEE
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 20 Jul 2015 14:42:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by iecri3 with SMTP id ri3so23971378iec.2
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Mon, 20 Jul 2015 07:42:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=vinumeris.com; s=google;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
bh=jfYBk03kaEmti/9U9WLpT4EtB1iuKbGa2wiEt0MwF38=;
b=DsoYzk/8sTHGVpQy4wo2ktLkicc0gAjC4OHYDqMyXDbYRzH5WkLvaQ+lrydmOVxRcg
d+1EHSgrgukeyJzgxHaqBX2mxbFm/bf8OQNXiu5tdzVpZaa8OWFXTpnBwSj3QS82wltZ
xubbiXtWoyTs12Wlem6+OUjROruo5rMevT5ng=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=jfYBk03kaEmti/9U9WLpT4EtB1iuKbGa2wiEt0MwF38=;
b=YwtMXHUAhklSplHlV8QNKWVwPn+jxS2DUoRWLBRDdtOdgU5i9RmQplDKhG13a8GbOi
M4aw7+uZgeWGyn4F24X8L97kktzhrjLy00uoiI+QZJHH6OEdvb9GU6vYQCIqr+V4m9Le
gjez8eWSaibScpXg13zjV2yvZAbMqT8OTYZ6Hh54IysakrmYCcBt/HOGTvodneMpjdZk
jDI5S8YqA0SsocQ0XaoN8LA9dWVVrcxSEXOG7hfe3rzOw+SjlammkfLyWMzZG6oKjJyL
VNuyl9SjPIC3Wyo5l2ZTLB4/jE3B2ZQzBSHbmY+X6+ds3wA9ufmDBnVvWYreQIw/J/3H
IGWQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlIJ4upPwxQfeuzW49mR0NJNgJSl+ok72RiThT3hkNx7cu+Bsx875oKch4Y6zZCiDBETGAT
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.40.147 with SMTP id o141mr36941976ioo.83.1437403326124;
Mon, 20 Jul 2015 07:42:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.108.111 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 07:42:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55AD0669.4040002@electrum.org>
References: <CA+w+GKQbOMz5nb_SnLB6Xb0FYzNZ_rEj5nbNjm2jY0+L8JJGAA@mail.gmail.com>
<55A4AF62.4090607@electrum.org>
<CA+w+GKRCPEUezaTb46pzuDNxKNgi_KdTW2dOn9hsHwgD159czw@mail.gmail.com>
<55AB8785.4080201@electrum.org>
<CA+w+GKTtkYUst0UJa6364LqBRqWYrA+fOKed973mQCQS4ze=4Q@mail.gmail.com>
<55AD0669.4040002@electrum.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 16:42:05 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+w+GKSqqD=Fwyptzd_skq3+-x2dFxjY_gOOtEuAo7ZPQ9AzoA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <hearn@vinumeris.com>
To: Thomas Voegtlin <thomasv@electrum.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1141d818a73009051b4f8a10
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham
version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposal: extend bip70 with OpenAlias
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 14:42:07 -0000
--001a1141d818a73009051b4f8a10
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> In my previous post, I was suggesting to *not* include the proof in the
> request, because the payer can download it independently. Only the final
> signature is needed. What makes DNSSEC interesting is not the size of
> the proof, but rather the fact that you can request it easily, and in a
> canonical way.
>
Yes, but you still need the final signature. Is it possible to use an EC
signature with DNSSEC? I thought it was an all-RSA system. If I'm wrong
about that, and all you need is 32 bytes, then my argument does not hold.
--001a1141d818a73009051b4f8a10
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blo=
ckquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #c=
cc solid;padding-left:1ex">In my previous post, I was suggesting to *not* i=
nclude the proof in the<br>
request, because the payer can download it independently. Only the final<br=
>
signature is needed. What makes DNSSEC interesting is not the size of<br>
the proof, but rather the fact that you can request it easily, and in a<br>
canonical way.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes, but you still need =
the final signature. Is it possible to use an EC signature with DNSSEC? I t=
hought it was an all-RSA system. If I'm wrong about that, and all you n=
eed is 32 bytes, then my argument does not hold.</div></div></div></div>
--001a1141d818a73009051b4f8a10--
|
