1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <pete@petertodd.org>) id 1Y5YzH-0001rG-AG
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 29 Dec 2014 11:59:51 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org
designates 62.13.149.113 as permitted sender)
client-ip=62.13.149.113; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org;
helo=outmail149113.authsmtp.com;
Received: from outmail149113.authsmtp.com ([62.13.149.113])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1Y5Yz1-0004hf-5a for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 29 Dec 2014 11:59:51 +0000
Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235])
by punt15.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id sBTBxSeZ090435;
Mon, 29 Dec 2014 11:59:28 GMT
Received: from [10.215.242.152] ([46.115.20.242]) (authenticated bits=0)
by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id sBTBxOQD068672
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Mon, 29 Dec 2014 11:59:25 GMT
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <26300405.yWTjxdDyQj@coldstorage>
References: <CANEZrP1tGYOsShk5Z91_JwH7E0pX8WcyT_-ZBkrWBqZAyrcd1A@mail.gmail.com>
<3685166.ROb67lzbMM@coldstorage>
<CANEZrP0GsuiCF4oHGnTnVXwUsc0dNBOTtusr_CFn+29SxYYwHw@mail.gmail.com>
<26300405.yWTjxdDyQj@coldstorage>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=UTF-8
From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 12:59:16 +0100
To: Thomas Zander <thomas@thomaszander.se>,
Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <8CB91BE2-ABA8-43B0-ADA5-CA1D811F80F5@petertodd.org>
X-Server-Quench: 22f68136-8f52-11e4-b396-002590a15da7
X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at:
http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse
X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR
aAdMdAsUHFAXAgsB AmIbWlVeVVR7W2U7 bwxPbARYfEhOQQdu
UldNRFdNFUsrc3hz TmF/Jhl0fwNBejB2 ZUJqEHJZCkJydEV7
X0YCEG8bZGY1bH1N U0leagNUcgZDfk5E bwQuUz1vNG8XDQg5
AwQ0PjZ0MThBJSBS WgQAK04nCW0CBCI7 SAoLBTUiByUA
X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1023:706
X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255)
X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 46.115.20.242/465
X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own
anti-virus system.
X-Spam-Score: -1.5 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.0 TIME_LIMIT_EXCEEDED Exceeded time limit / deadline
X-Headers-End: 1Y5Yz1-0004hf-5a
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Cartographer
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 11:59:51 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 29 December 2014 12:49:45 CET, Thomas Zander <thomas@thomaszander.se> wrote:
>On Monday 29. December 2014 11.30.42 Mike Hearn wrote:
>> With the current DNS protocol you get an all or nothing choice
>
>Its a seed. Not the protocol itself.
>
>> Firstly, Peter, get help. I'm serious.
>I think most would agree with me that, Mike, this answer is not just a
>little
>over the line, its unacceptable behavior in any collaborative group.
>Please be respectful and avoid ad-hominem attacks.
Yes I agree, Mike shouldn't be making ad-hominim attacks by calling people "a parody"
You'll note my response however carefully avoiding talking about the person who originated the idea, and merely stuck to criticising - via parody - the idea itself.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: APG v1.1.1
iQFQBAEBCAA6BQJUoUIUMxxQZXRlciBUb2RkIChsb3cgc2VjdXJpdHkga2V5KSA8
cGV0ZUBwZXRlcnRvZGQub3JnPgAKCRAZnIM7qOfwhfnpB/9JMcBtq7nCudCvXWgZ
TyKiSrK811L1PxtPih6UtzskFzNIKIVOgJrZcc0Cs7AoFoXiIPVEqzsqOOjZbhst
Op2w2scUoQhvhweNLAUdAH5dY+GFJoOn5fol4BD95SuFuao/t1J8G4Ma4b+JGXR5
vlXtDD/dBJNWJeSVKN/Mgcp7eis3lXp1/rzc9/Ka45oXvUHFSxvQq2v/KgFeHKJ7
onx551+41MS7R1bedg+dPOtCFBFycW51Obt7vS8GudRqwKyuKoKIQzY910gHYdXL
gTdQ16wXvp06fYlR4nJJPosE7ADP1udKJZNskVObJsX5z9sukI3r7noHNDDg3ZjH
bS9/
=ouap
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
