1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <luke@dashjr.org>) id 1UJTAK-0007N8-Uf
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 23 Mar 2013 18:27:40 +0000
X-ACL-Warn:
Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
id 1UJTAJ-00067V-JH for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Sat, 23 Mar 2013 18:27:40 +0000
Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown [173.170.142.26])
(Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD68627A2966;
Sat, 23 Mar 2013 18:27:31 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@exmulti.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 18:27:20 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.7.3-gentoo; KDE/4.9.5; x86_64; ; )
References: <CA+8xBpcwLUt=RBYynbQDwY2Bv1keCPy0pdXP4+8CG-wqvrxOCA@mail.gmail.com>
<201303231751.48969.luke@dashjr.org>
<CA+8xBpdSHxbzSZenTCLrh7yfCWMLXokbdupTkjpU0V2+B1YV3w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+8xBpdSHxbzSZenTCLrh7yfCWMLXokbdupTkjpU0V2+B1YV3w@mail.gmail.com>
X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F
X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F
X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201303231827.23273.luke@dashjr.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-2.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain
X-Headers-End: 1UJTAJ-00067V-JH
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Upcoming network event: block v2 lock-in
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 18:27:41 -0000
On Saturday, March 23, 2013 6:21:32 PM Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org> wrote:
> > bitcoind is nowhere in the implementation of the miner end of BIP 34.
>
> Again, not strictly true.
>
> bitcoind's 'getblocktemplate' RPC call used by some supplies the block
> version, selects transactions for the miner, and other tasks integral
> to the implementation of the miner and BIP 34.
Transaction selection and everything else bitcoind does, is irrelevant to BIP
34. It is incompatible with getblocktemplate for coinbase-creating software to
produce v2 blocks without implementing BIP 34 themselves, even if the upstream
GBT server specifies it.
|
