summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/4b/b4c2b8baf98b9613054aac097656b9d7d43563
blob: 20aadd1e4c53ff4c217c50048b286f2b1212b7c0 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
Return-Path: <eric@voskuil.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17243486
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:00:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pf0-f173.google.com (mail-pf0-f173.google.com
	[209.85.192.173])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 971421D9
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:00:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pf0-f173.google.com with SMTP id d2so45373184pfd.0
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Wed, 16 Nov 2016 16:00:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=voskuil-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
	h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
	:in-reply-to; bh=bxmJUdnYV7VJQ2OGbTa71/Kvar+Jaorw/eqEdguX4+Q=;
	b=sqWoP2edJy9mmY/FD5YQmygughrmi/S8yOd0iyA0KxkdvhPYte7PsB/OmMlSNSgmlF
	rZPeyienG1ppduX2BgPiFjzyVDVRPhSl8PxDJYQ0kobOj5RikJLUJSrYsEB57gEfMbwD
	Cs+sSYDNBExxTiSKlJGTO0E1rg5oVaZh0YwEchvttqCQZA1TnkxZ5G7EgvTn+gf7XM2A
	FcBRhDg4udq7jdNAJGpGlUiYktRUxmxk/XicrqKd18sQ3ZBgcF6SvNZTcUsEtZMDmwGK
	jxtd1+urqr7iGtYpm6QZz6tE6chBN1li3gZDhqD8NlH82sU4u0JBA71Yn8wynY1P1Kqz
	xFHw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to;
	bh=bxmJUdnYV7VJQ2OGbTa71/Kvar+Jaorw/eqEdguX4+Q=;
	b=dwvO01sPluySAQUsb5xKqYyyrrOhhd9RLWOV0KcMAwcuhmozHc6Ra1T09tzcnLumKQ
	ose/0pjoH5mNQRn3/mMRGZtyQFGuH9MSi3HjrJo2M4nDcVASG5mM3jGMSWq5wgUxP5OA
	VHgOFg5Ft41FqV4UhthtYeeUETkQK74Yf2WpyQDk4GhBsNvPz9MmTaprVsf7SJeXKOZX
	BO32+P+TGzSSGQIsjwt930QcFqfOzdPXZbnAO3K4e5PcllU1+CzgiJAZ6BBzc9k3vCXQ
	CwC1KX/L8syaIp5WcMRoApn0Tl6MBEWM+qOE6bmxsJRk8hCvcy8AA7UqU0gHvaU/iWeD
	7kdQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdg4FnYcFDKHKPwSkEbtBa6KUKrxzSPMewIKAC6/E1e1aHGhULqowUBJO9QyNgmaA==
X-Received: by 10.98.198.207 with SMTP id x76mr342539pfk.33.1479340833179;
	Wed, 16 Nov 2016 16:00:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:600:9000:d69e:8084:4206:2529:776d?
	([2601:600:9000:d69e:8084:4206:2529:776d])
	by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k67sm272538pfk.69.2016.11.16.16.00.32
	(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
	Wed, 16 Nov 2016 16:00:32 -0800 (PST)
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jorge_Tim=c3=b3n?= <jtimon@jtimon.cc>,
	Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
	Thomas Kerin <me@thomaskerin.io>
References: <CAFp6fsGmynRXLCqKAA+iBXObGOZ2h3DVW8k5L9kSfbPmL1Y-QQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CEDAD65E-512A-43CA-9BD6-56F7D9E6897C@voskuil.org>
	<CADJgMzunxU2-7Z_ZPafNY4BPRu0x9oeh6v2dg0nUYqxJbXeGYA@mail.gmail.com>
	<33BFC318-0BB4-48DB-B5DC-08247FAC6E5A@voskuil.org>
	<CADL_X_dJ8YuDevKR4xA+PTy9D089dAeZ1F3ZwSYG6MrMvkLweg@mail.gmail.com>
	<A98BB7F2-7AE2-4D84-9F38-7E7E9D5D3210@voskuil.org>
	<e86b5b85-591d-5342-6a75-3ebd501f1789@thomaskerin.io>
	<CABm2gDqy+iBdw3W2dap8rdi5TD-5_VSmFnakvEbYeAtgpdLgMg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Voskuil <eric@voskuil.org>
Message-ID: <6191e5f2-4cc7-b3ff-b4e7-bb7979e24d1f@voskuil.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 16:00:33 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/45.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABm2gDqy+iBdw3W2dap8rdi5TD-5_VSmFnakvEbYeAtgpdLgMg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="7PECbTlMSa2eDftIHJkRD2roBATkG8oV2"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:10:02 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] [BIP Proposal] Buried Deployments
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 00:00:34 -0000

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--7PECbTlMSa2eDftIHJkRD2roBATkG8oV2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 11/16/2016 03:58 PM, Jorge Tim=C3=B3n via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Thomas Kerin via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> BIP30 actually was given similar treatment after a reasonable amount o=
f time
>> had passed.
>> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L2392
>=20
> This is not really the same. BIP30 is not validated after BIP34 is
> active because blocks complying with BIP34 will always necessarily
> comply with BIP30 (ie coinbases cannot be duplicated after they
> include the block height).

This is a misinterpretation of BIP30. Duplicate transaction hashes can
and will happen and are perfectly valid in Bitcoin. BIP34 does not
prevent this.

e


--7PECbTlMSa2eDftIHJkRD2roBATkG8oV2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYLPMiAAoJEDzYwH8LXOFOJFwH/imNIT41aaGiSPAZJ9ukpVOT
+GGeXnFk3/sw1EtWPl/I5mPeLARjP6v8m0HCNaCeEAJOszQEr3zYfRAiOn9LYyCb
pEiT4qIeoGZpVhC6k99RZySBgPL8u9LcV7rKlNWrGpdZPuwSuWVg0ar+Rvr9YCmw
jeSnZLo+/+W67DErxcUj9kz4fOn7Ifupb3WewHg4mEQzw7hOtTH91IlIIjqEYOLa
qDhaP6L/OO9mrvvtpPojONcoyFmmwYgmjDfsdnXG4HCdJhlgU/oExL4Klvjun1Rc
O8wwxW8gXkdC9gAxsCwxBrdByn5aKjSDKHf5AsVKxmYbDpjKkx0AZs/2lvJZ01I=
=P2pf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--7PECbTlMSa2eDftIHJkRD2roBATkG8oV2--