1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
|
Return-Path: <luke@dashjr.org>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FCF0F4A
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 25 Jul 2019 03:05:50 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from zinan.dashjr.org (zinan.dashjr.org [192.3.11.21])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBF87FE
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Thu, 25 Jul 2019 03:05:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ishibashi.lan (adsl-67-34-245-3.asm.bellsouth.net [67.34.245.3])
(Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8907838A0DC3;
Thu, 25 Jul 2019 03:04:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-Hashcash: 1:25:190725:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org::GAnhObZ9b=T7WFRT:cCvtp
X-Hashcash: 1:25:190725:andreas@schildbach.de::B0gkc=8Fa1CrgOVz:dJ6fv
From: Luke Dashjr <luke@dashjr.org>
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 03:04:25 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10
References: <59fad2b6-9b15-ffec-116e-91d27ce29f80@mattcorallo.com>
<qh2qj1$7sg4$1@blaine.gmane.org> <qh76ln$41ag$1@blaine.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <qh76ln$41ag$1@blaine.gmane.org>
X-KMail-QuotePrefix: >
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <201907250304.27179.luke@dashjr.org>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 05:32:14 +0000
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core to disable Bloom-based Filtering by
default
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 03:05:50 -0000
On Tuesday 23 July 2019 14:47:18 Andreas Schildbach via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> > the DNS seed infrastructure among others can easily direct
> > wallets to those nodes
>
> Last I checked none of the seeds did. But I agree this would be nice to
> have.
It's supported by default in sipa's bitcoin-seeder, which many DNS seeds us=
e.
My seed also currently requires NODE_BLOOM for *any* answers returned.
(But I don't guarantee that will remain forever.)
> As a side note, Coinbase just announced their 30M'th wallet. I'm
> convinced this massive run into custodial wallets...
Light wallets are just as bad for the network as custodial wallets.
> IMHO, BIP 37 is the only scaling technology that has proven successful and
> could =E2=80=93 if supported and improved rather than choked =E2=80=93 co=
ntinue to help
> holding against the bitbanks trend.
Light wallets are not Bitcoin scaling. They are just trusting anonymous 3rd=
=20
parties, which is harmful to Bitcoin.
Luke
|
