1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
|
Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <mh.in.england@gmail.com>) id 1W7oUT-0003Oa-D2
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:52:49 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
designates 209.85.219.52 as permitted sender)
client-ip=209.85.219.52; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com;
helo=mail-oa0-f52.google.com;
Received: from mail-oa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.219.52])
by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
(Exim 4.76) id 1W7oUS-0002wO-LE
for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:52:49 +0000
Received: by mail-oa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id i4so6843602oah.39
for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:52:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.42.105 with SMTP id n9mr23908974obl.33.1390837963241;
Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:52:43 -0800 (PST)
Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com
Received: by 10.76.99.112 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:52:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABsx9T1Y3sO6eS54wsj377BL4rGoghx1uDzD+SY3tTgc1PPbHg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <lc409d$4mf$1@ger.gmane.org>
<CABsx9T1Y3sO6eS54wsj377BL4rGoghx1uDzD+SY3tTgc1PPbHg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:52:43 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: T_SeDAXAi9Sz6iN02DnH8QBm3AU
Message-ID: <CANEZrP0ENhJJhba8Xwj_cVzNKGDUQriia_Q=JWTXpztb6ic8rg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae939981fbd7e2304f0f5b23b
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
sender-domain
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(mh.in.england[at]gmail.com)
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1W7oUS-0002wO-LE
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: PaymentACK semantics
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:52:49 -0000
--14dae939981fbd7e2304f0f5b23b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
At the moment there's no way to distinguish between a failed / rejected
submission and a successful one beyond the freeform memo field, right? It'd
be good if we had an error code field as well, perhaps for a future version.
--14dae939981fbd7e2304f0f5b23b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
<div dir="ltr">At the moment there's no way to distinguish between a failed / rejected submission and a successful one beyond the freeform memo field, right? It'd be good if we had an error code field as well, perhaps for a future version.</div>
--14dae939981fbd7e2304f0f5b23b--
|
